Mopani Water Dialogue 2024 report | Mahlathini Development Foundation

DRAFT REPORT

Mopani District Municipality WaterDialogues 2024

Rural Water Innovation and Governance: Addressing Water Supply,

Climate Challenges, and Governance in Rural Areas of Mopani District

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the funding and support for the programme entitled adaptive response

and local scale adaptation for improving water security and increasing resilience to climate change

in selected communities in Giyani, Limpopo. The programme is funded by the Government of

Flanders and managed Water Research Commission.

DISCLAIMER

This report has been reviewed by the Water Research Commission (WRC). Approval does not signify that the

contents necessarily reflect the views and policies of the WRC, nor does mention of trade names or

commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.

This report was produced by the Association for Water and Rural Development (AWARD) for the

GLSCRP programme.

Association for Water and Rural Development (AWARD)

P O Box 1919

Hoedspruit 1380

Limpopo, South Africa

T 015-793 0503

W award.org.za

Company Reg. No. 98/03011/08

3 
Contents
1
1Executive summary ...............................................................................................9
2SECTION 2: Water Dialogues Report ..........................................................................11
Session one: Enough water for rural communities:Supporting Rural Water Supply in the Face of 
Climate Change..................................................................................................11
Session two: Rural water governance: What are the options and supported self-supply: empowering
committees to be involved ....................................................................................11
Session three: The role of research and innovation in rural water  supplyfunding rural water
innovation- what have we learnt? ............................................................................12
3SECTION 3: Summary of break-away sessions ...............................................................13
 Challenges ........................................................................................................13
 Available innovations, collaborations & interventions .....................................................15
 Resolutions .......................................................................................................16
3.3.1 Resolutions for the Research Development and Innovation Unit.......................................17
 Session 4: Panel discussion .....................................................................................19
 Dialogue: Comments and discussion from the floor ........................................................22
 Mopani District Municipality responds ........................................................................23
4SECTION 4 Analysis and synthesis of data ...................................................................25
 Data analysis.....................................................................................................25
 Challenges ........................................................................................................25
4.2.1 Summary of the frequency analysis of challenges identified by participants.........................26
4.2.2 Expanded analysis:............................................................................................26
4.2.3 Insights from data on challenges:...........................................................................27
 Recommendations and proposed resolutions ................................................................28
4.3.1 Frequency Distribution .......................................................................................28
4.3.2 Analysis of Priority Areas ....................................................................................29
4.3.3 Key Themes Identified .......................................................................................29
 Panel member contributions ...................................................................................33
4.4.1 Cecilia Mashaba (Department of Water and Sanitation - DWS) .........................................33
4.4.2 Edson Warambwa (MISA - Municipal Infrastructure Support Agent) ....................................33
4.4.3 Erna Kruger (Mahlathini Development Foundation - MDF) ...............................................34
4.4.4 Angy Pholane (COGHSTA) ....................................................................................35
4.4.5 Shafick Adams (Water Research Commission - WRC) .....................................................36
4.4.6 Lebogang Sebola (Lepelle Northern Water) ...............................................................36
5SECTION 5: Proposed areas for resolutions ..................................................................38
 Water Allocation, Security, and Resource Management that recognises scarcity......................38

4 
 Climate-Smart Infrastructure in Water Services Delivery..................................................38
 Solar Systems and Sustainable Energy Use ...................................................................38
 Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Planning ................................................................39
 Stakeholder and Community collaboration ..................................................................39
 Decentralisation Delivery Models and Water Access, Specifically Support Self-Supply Models .......39
 Governance, Compliance, and Accountability...............................................................39
 Financial Management and Resource Allocation ............................................................40
 Capacity Building and Skills Development ...................................................................40
 Research, Innovation, and Local Knowledge ...............................................................40
 Water Pollution Control, Disease Preparedness and Response Systems................................40
 Monitoring, Reporting, and Continuous Improvement....................................................40
6SECTION 6: Synthesis of key issues to be taken forward ...................................................42
7SECTION 7: Process plan and map for way forward ........................................................43
8Appendices .......................................................................................................44

Mopani Water Dialogues

Title:Rural Water Innovation and Governance: Addressing Water Quantity, Quality, Climate

Challenge, and Governance in Rural Areas of Mopani District

Dates: Two-Day Dialogue

Venue: Tzaneen, Fairview Hotel

Conveners: Water Research Commission (WRC), AWARD, Mopani District Municipality (MDM)

Partners: University of Western Cape (UWC), Tsogang Water and Sanitation (TWS), Office of the

Premier, Department of Water and Sanitation, Lepelle Northern Water, and others.

Background: The Dialogue Session on Rural Water Innovation and Governance is being convened to

address critical challenges in rural water supply systems, particularly focusing on water quantity

and quality, the impacts of climate change, and innovations in water resource management. Hosted

by key institutions, including the Water Research Commission (WRC), AWARD, and Mopani District

Municipality, this event brings together stakeholders from academia, local government, civil

society, and the private sector to discuss sustainable water management in the Greater Giyani

region.

Rural areas, particularly in the Giyani region, are experiencing severewater scarcity exacerbated

by erratic rainfall, limited infrastructure, and the rising impacts of climate change. This Dialogue

Session will explore various water solutions, including solar-powered boreholes, multiple-use

systems (MUS), self-supply mechanisms, and innovativewastewaterreuse technologies. It will also

delve into governance structures that support local rural systems and discuss the integration of

research, innovation, and governance in addressing water challenges.

Purpose: The Dialogue Session seeks to create a platform for sharing knowledge, experiences, and

innovations in rural water supply systems, emphasizing the importance of self-supported water

supply models and governance structures that support sustainable management. The Dialogue

Session will focus on preparing recommendations and resolutions for submission to the Mopani

District Municipality Strategic Planning in 2025 as well as the Limpopo Provincial Water Summit.

Key Objectives:

•To address the complexities of water quantity and quality management, particularly in

rural communities with limited infrastructure.

•To discuss water supply innovations, such as solar-powered boreholes, reverse osmosis,

wastewater reuse, and their potential applications in rural settings.

•To explore the impacts of climate change on water resources and develop strategies to

enhance the resilience of rural water systems.

•To assess the governance frameworks necessary to support rural water management,

including the roleof local government, compliance structures, and community involvement.

•To examine funding mechanisms that support innovation and sustainable water supply in

rural municipalities.

•To identify opportunities for research and innovation that bridge the gap between local

governance and water resource management.

•To prepare a compendium of recommendations and resolutions for submission to Mopani

Water Summit

Programme Overview:

Day 1: Focus on Water Supply Systems and Climate Change Challenges for water supply in rural

Mopani including the role of research and innovation

Day 2: Focus on Resolutions and Commitments and way forward to 2025 Strategic planning and

beyond. To prepare for the Limpopo Water Summit.

Focus Audience:

•Municipal leaders and officials from the Greater Giyani Local and Mopani District

Municipalities.

•Representatives from the Water Research Commission (WRC) and water management

agencies.

•Academic institutions and researchers focused on water governance, climate change, and

rural development.

•Community representatives and members involved in local water management.

•Private sector entities and those interested in water innovation and sustainability.

Expected Outcomes:

•Enhanced understanding of rural water supply challenges and innovative solutions,

particularly MUS and solar-powered systems.

•Development of actionable strategies for mitigating climate change impacts on rural water

supply.

•Strengthened partnerships among local government, communities, and research institutions

to foster innovation in rural water supply and management.

•Resolutions for future collaboration and funding opportunities to support rural water

initiatives.

This Dialogue Session aims to catalyze a long-term, sustainable approach to rural water

management that leverages innovation, governance, and research to meet the water needs of rural

communities.

Attendees:

Name of Institutions

No. Of people attended

Mopani District Municipality

Greater Giyani Local Municipality

Department of Water and Sanitation

Greater Letaba Local Municipality

Greater Tzaneen Local Municipality

Ba-Phalaborwa Local Municipality

COGHSTA

Lepelle Northern Water

AWARD

10.

LDARD

11.

Dzumeri Traditional Authority

12.

Mahlathini Development Foundation

13.

Maruleng Local Municipality

14.

Limpopo of Office the Premier

15.

University of Limpopo

16.

Wits University

17.

MISA

18.

DBSA

19.

Tsogang Water and Sanitation

20.

Mapoe

21.

Department of Education

Table 1: Table showing different institutions that attended the dialogues and number of attendees

from each institution.

1Executive summary

The analysis of water management challenges and solutions in Mopani highlights several recurring

themes and critical areas for intervention. Addressing water distribution, infrastructure, pollution,

and groundwater management requires a multifaceted approach that incorporates technical,

financial, and social dimensions.

Key Challenges

1.Operation and Maintenance (O&M): Inadequate planning, incomplete projects, and poor

maintenance practices are major obstacles, affecting the long-term functionality of water

systems.

2.Infrastructure Limitations: Both limited and aging infrastructure pose significant

challenges, indicating the need for expansion and upgrades to meet current and future

demands.

3.Financial Constraints: Cost recovery and budget limitations hinder sustainable water

management, impacting the ability to maintain and expand systems effectively.

4.Water Resource Allocation: Ensuring equitable and sufficient distribution of water from

limited resources remains a critical challenge.

5.Community Engagement and Collaboration: Limited community involvement and capacity,

as well as partnership challenges, highlight the need for a more inclusive and participatory

approach.

6.Technical Capacity Gaps: A shortage of skilled personnel and technical resources impedes

the efficient operation and maintenance of water infrastructure.

Key Patterns and Solutions

•Effective Planning & Capacity Building: Planning and training are seen as essential to the

success of water management projects. Emphasis is placed on equipping local personnel

with the skills needed to manage water systems sustainably.

•Financial and Technical Support: The need for robust financial planning and technical

expertise is critical to overcoming budget constraints and ensuring the sustainability of

water systems.

•Focus on O&M for Sustainability: Long-term project success relies heavily on consistent

operation and maintenance practices, highlighting the need for proper budgeting and asset

management.

•Collaboration and Community Involvement: Involving local communities and establishing

strong partnerships is necessary for successful and inclusive water management, fostering

ownership and accountability.

•Diversification and Resilience: Expanding water resources and approaches is essential to

building resilience against climate change, with a focus on flexibility and adaptation.

Recommendations

The Mopani Water Dialogue underscored the need for a comprehensive strategy to address the

region's water challenges. Key recommendations include:

1.Proactive Infrastructure Maintenance: Prioritize the maintenance of existing assets,

supported by proper asset management and targeted funding. This includes upgrading aging

infrastructure and expanding systems where necessary.

2.Water Pollution Control and Wastewater Management: Focus on reducing pollution and

improving wastewater management to ensure a cleaner and more sustainable water supply.

3.Sustainable Groundwater and Climate-Resilient Infrastructure: Invest in climate-smart

infrastructure and sustainable groundwater management to secure water availability in the

face of changing climate conditions.

4.Community-Driven Water Security: Empower local communities to take an active role in

managing water resources,ensuring long-term access and fostering local ownership of

water systems.

5.Cross-Sector Collaboration: Enhance coordination between different stakeholders—

government, private sector, and civil society—to develop integrated and sustainable

solutions for water management.

Overall, the focus on strategic innovation, robust maintenance, and inclusive planning reflects a

balanced approach to building a resilient and adaptive water management system in Mopani. This

approach integrates technical know-how with community-driven initiatives, aiming for a sustainable

future that can withstand the challenges of climate change and resource scarcity.

2SECTION 2: Water Dialogues Report

In this section we present the activities and outcomes from each session according to the

programme.

Session one: Enough water for rural communities: Supporting

Rural Water Supply in the Face of Climate Change

The session addressed the growing challenges that climate change presents for rural water supply,

including pressures on water availability, quality, and infrastructure. Innovations and responses

from water service providers were explored, along with the critical role of empowering

communities to operate and maintain water systems. The importance of local innovations—ranging

from drinking water solutions to agricultural practices and entrepreneurship—was highlighted as a

key strategy for building climate resilience.

This session explored the complexities of providing consistent and sustainable water supply in rural

areas, focusing on the challenges of water quality, quantity, and the various supply options

available. The discussion covered the importance of designing water systems that account for

multiple uses—drinking, livelihoods, and the environment—while ensuring community involvement

and participation in all stages of project management. Together, participants examined the

necessary steps to build inclusive, resilient water solutions to meet the diverse needs of rural

communities.

Session two: Rural water governance: What are the options and

supported self-supply: empowering committees to be involved

The session focused on the governance of local rural water systems, drawing on experiences to

highlight various management options such as ownership and co-management. It explored the

critical role of agreements, contracts, and service level agreements (SLAs), as well as the

importance of governance structures and compliance in ensuring the effective and sustainable

management of water systems in rural areas. The discussion centered on which governance models

worked best and what improvements could be made to strengthen rural water supply management.

The session also delved into the concept of supported self-supply and its potential to meet multiple

water use (MUS) needs in rural settings such as Giyani. It examined the requirements for supported

self-supply to succeed, the obstacles that could arise, and the institutional arrangements that

governed rural water supply options. Additionally, it foregrounded governance issues, exploring the

benefits and limitations of supported self-supply, and discussed how empowering local committees

and communities could enhance water system management. Finally, it considered what innovations

and improvements could be made to optimize self-supply systems in rural areas.

Figure 1 A break-away group discusses the topic at hand

Session three: The role of research and innovation in rural water

supply funding rural water innovation- what have we learnt?

The session explored how research and innovation (R&I) intersected with local governance in

shaping rural water supply solutions. It discussed the provincial research agenda and the

importance of supporting local governance research efforts. Additionally,it examined the critical

interface between institutions of higher learning and rural communities, emphasizing how

collaboration could drive innovation and improve water supply systems.

In this session, the presenter unpacked what funding meant in the context of rural water

innovations, looking at the various sources of funding available to support these initiatives. The

session explored the critical role that grant funding plays in fostering innovation, particularly in

rural settings, and discussed how these financial resources could be harnessed to drive sustainable

and impactful solutions in water supply.

Figure 2 Delegates at the Water Dialogues

3SECTION 3: Summary of break-away sessions

In this section we present the data collected form the breakaway session. Only one breakaway

session was held as there was inadequate time for the other sessions.

Challenges

During the break-away sessions, challenges that the participants mentioned were written down on

cards in order to capture all the challenges before they were analysed. The data were then

analysed according to categories listed in table 2 below.

Figure 3 Picture showing challenges cards from break-away sessions

Table 2: Table listing all the challenges mentioned in break-away groups

CATEGORY CODE

CHALLENGES

Aging infrastructure

State of infrastructure (old need an upgrade)

Aging infrastructure

ageing infrastructure

Aging infrastructure

Treatment Plant Old

Allocation

No equitable share of water

Allocation

Communities not accessing water because of

Streams water channeled to the farms

Allocation

Communities not accessing water because of

Streams water channeled to the farms Streams water chanelled to the

farms

Allocation

Inadequate allocation of water : 50litres per person perd day

allocation

Borehole management

Poor borehole management / pit toilets contaminate ground water

Climate Impacts

Drought and seasonal variation

Climate impacts

climate change impacts, drought

Collaboration

Lack of collaboration between local government and the communities

Community involvement

Limitations in appointing communities as intermediaries

community involvement

Low level of infrastructure development (Community not involved &

taking ownership)

Cost recovery

Cost recovery vs status of indigent policy

Cost recovery

(Cost recovery, Asset Management, and System Management)

Effluent discharge

Massive sewage spillage (Run off to water bodies)

Energizing of boreholes

No power connection to boreholes

Energizing of boreholes

No power connection of boreholes

Enforcement

Poor enforcement

Enforcement

Poor Law enforcement (Monitoring of sewage, Deposition of sewage

inside water bodies)

Funding

No budget for specific villages

Funding

Budget Constrains

Funding

Budget Constrains

Governance systems

Poor Institutional tools

Groundwater management

Unstable ground water abstractions

Limited infrastructure

Limited Water infrastructures

Limited infrastructure

Limited Water infrastructures

Incompetent services

providers

Incompetent Service providers

Limited water resources

water resources

Limited water resources

Not enough above ground water

Limited water resources

Lack of resources

Limited water resources

inadequate resources

Limited water resources

Not enough above ground

water resources

Management practices

Management of water sources

Monitoring

How do we measure successful outcomes?

Motivation

Lack of willingness by officials to implement solutions provided

O & M

Operation and Maintenance

O & M

Poor planning of O&M,

O & M

Incomplete projects,

O & M

Not enough qualified personnel,

O & M

Incapacity of personnel

O &M

Operation and Maintenance

O &M

Operation and Maintenance (poor planning of O&M,

Planning

Poor Planning

Planning

Poor project Planning (Implementing bulk water project with no

source)

Political issues

Political Interference (Borehole not used in the villages )

Poor systems

Poor Institutional tools

(Cost recovery, Asset Management, and System Management)

Practices

Poor Agricultural practices

(flood irrigation)

Practices

Poor Agricultural practices

Practices

No best practice WCWDM project yet

Procurement

Centralized procurement services

Project management

Incomplete projects,

Skills

inadequate technical skills

Skills

Incapacity of personnel)

Skills

Not enough qualified personnel,

Spatial planning

Spatial Planning, unplanned development /poor integrated

development

Spatial planning

Poor spatial planning (Road planning, Sewage systems, new

settlements, population growth)

Unlawful Practices

illegal water connections

Unlawful practices

water mafias, illegal water tankers

Vandalism

Vandalism of infrastructure

Vandalism

Theft and vandalism

Vandalism

Vandalism of infrastructure

Water Tankers

Emergency Water Tankers are a problem

Water tankers

Emergency Water Tankers

Available innovations, collaborations & interventions

Participant contributions regarding available innovations, collaboration and interventions were also

written down on cards across the break-away groups to capture all the suggestions that the groups

had. The information was then categorised in table 3 below.

Figure 4 Picture showing innovation cards from break-away sessions

CATEGORY CODE

INNOVATIONS

Co management

Co- Management & co creation innovations

Co-management

Community Support (Support community initiatives, e.g

community mountain stream project)

Energy innovation

Windmills for energy generation for boreholes and other

infrastructure

Energy innovation

Solar panels for energy generation

Governance systems

Governance Innovation (decentralised or centralized

governance)

Governance systems

Decentralise Water infrastructure

Groundwater

Quantify groundwater

resources

Implement policy

Adopt 2020 version strategies from DWS

Implement policy

Adopt river project strategies from LEDET- Cleaning of rivers

Infrastructure innovation

Package plants

Payment for services

Process of payment of services by rural communities

Practices

Assist farmers to adopt smart resilience farming (Drip irrigation,

Soil moisture sensors)

Practices

Implement Water conservation

demand management strategy

Pump innovation

Play-pumps for pumping water

Rainwater harvesting

Rain water harvesting

Rainwater harvesting

Enhance water harvesting

Social innovations

New Concept

(Social compact strategies)

Storage innovation

Storage facility improvement- Water conservation

Table 3: Table listing all the available innovations, collaboration and interventions

Resolutions

After the challenges and innovations were outlined by participants, they also suggested resolutions

to be submitted to the Mopani District Municipality. These resolutions were recorded for each

group. See the section 3 on analysis of this data for a visualisation in graphic form.

CATEGORY CODE

RECOMMENDATION AND PROPOSED RESOLUTION

Allocation

Fair distribution of water for multiple use

Design and plan

Proper planning for maintenance

Design and plan

Sectoral meetings to discuss possible solutions

Design and plan

Upscale WRC projects

Design, install, innovate

Design and install good security systems for solar

Develop

Create water security dashboard

Develop

Develop climate smart tools in agriculture

Diversify and plan

Diversify water resources

Diversify and plan

Diversify models for delivery

Enforce

Enforcement

Enforce

Enforce municipal bylaws

Enforcement

Pollution of water resources

Expansion and installation

Expand Solar based systems

Financial planning

Cross subsidization

Financial planning

Utilisation of 10% of MIG for repairs and maintenance and 5% MIG

for Asset Management

Financial planning

Enable action with resources – budgets

Implement new practices

Implement climate smart résilient infrastructure infrastructure

Improve and upgrade

Improve water storage infrastructure

Investigate and research

Groundwater assessments of availability before planning

groundwater delivery

Investigate and research

Comprehensive surface water audit

Investigate and research

Find ways of supporting indigenous responses

Investigate and research

Align WSDP to future developmental road maps

Involve and collaborate

Involve communities in planning sessions

Involve and collaborate

MoU s with research institutions

Involve and collaborate

DWS Directives and Court Orders

Monitor

GRIP reports

O & M

Operation and maintenance

O & M

Micro and Macro systems maintained

O &M

Create O & M budget

Project planning

Propose solutions, action owners and project plans

Project planning

Set timelines

Strategic planning

Identify the strategic issues and challenges for water & sanitation

Strategic planning

Disease response

Train & capacitate

Strengthen capacity for planning

Train & capacitate

Capacitate borehole operators

Train & capacitate

Water tankers programme

Train & capacitate

Strengthen water forums

Train & capacitate

Strengthen DDM

Train & capacitate

Address scarce technical skills

Table 5: Table showing resolutions for the rural water governance session

3.3.1 Resolutions for the Research Development and Innovation Unit

During Session 3 the presenter, Mr Ramatsi presented the plan to establish the Research,

Development and Innovation Unit in the MDM as depicted in figure xx below

The Research Development Innovation Unit (RDIU) in Mopani District will drive evidence based

planning for sustainable water management through research, innovation, and development. The

following strategic actions are proposed to guide its establishment:

1.Institutionalize Research Outcomes: Integrate research findings into policy and decision-

making to ensure evidence-based planning and continuous improvement of practices.

2.Set Up Collaborative Partnerships: Forge alliances with universities, research institutions,

local communities, and private sector stakeholders to support joint innovation and

knowledge sharing.

3.Define Scope and Functions: Clearly outline the roles and priorities of the RDIU, focusing

on areas like climate-smart agriculture, pollution control, and groundwater management,

guided by a dedicated steering committee.

4.Stay Updated on Water Technology: Track global and local innovations to ensure the

district adopts the latest, most effective water management solutions.

5.Incorporate Indigenous Knowledge Systems: Leverage traditional water management

practices alongside modern methods, engaging local communities in policy and planning

processes.

6.Develop a Research Database: Create a centralized repositoryfor storing and sharing

research data, case studies, and best practices, accessible to stakeholders.

7.Encourage Innovative Solutions: Support creative, non-mainstream ideas through an

innovation lab, seed funding, and incubation programs, with a focus on local solutions.

8.Prioritize Evidence-Based Planning: Utilize research for data-driven decision-making,

impact assessments, and long-term planning, with specific KPIs to measure success.

By following these strategies, the RDIU aims to build a resilient and sustainable water system in

Mopani, integrating technical, financial, and social dimensions while adapting to future challenges

Session 4: Panel discussion

The panel discussion brought together specialists from various organizations to reflect on the

resolutions developed in the previous day’s sessions. Participants introduced themselves and

outlined the roles and scope of their respective organizations, setting the stage for discussions on

critical water management issues in Mopani District Municipality (MDM). The discussion focused on

evaluating the proposed resolutions from three specific sessions: climate change and water

supply, local water management challenges in rural settings, and research and innovation

priorities.

Figure 5 Panel specialists

1.Panel of specialists:

•MISA – Warambwa Edson

•WRC - Shafick Adams

•MDF – Erna Kruger

•COGSTAH- Angy Pholane

•DWS- Cecilia Mashaba

•Lepelle Northern Water- Lebogang Sebola

Summary of issues raised by the panel:

Panel member

Panel discussion on recommendations and resolution

submitted for MDM

Cecilia Mashaba

DWS

1.Priorities that Mopani needs to focus on:

•Assets management/register

•Which will include infrastructure assessment, both new

and old for all villagers to assist with prioritizing

replacement in terms of medium and long term while

looking for funding.

•Operation and maintenance should also be included in

asset management.

•Come up with a pro-active maintenance plan.

•Educating communities about system operation.

•Community engagement and community ownership.

Municipality has to hand over in terms of operation and

maintenance to communities to operate at local level.

Edson Warambwa

MISA

1.Asset management is already provided for by MIG grant to the

district municipality, which is about R30 000 000, and it is not

used.

2.The issue of river pollution, for the past 5 years, Mopani

wastewater treatment has been releasing wastewater into the river

and farmers have been complaining about it. This is a big issue

with court cases where the municipality is sued to stop polluting

the river. This is urgent and has to be fixed

3.The MIG Grant is provided for money to fix this kinds of issues and

the action is rather slow.

4.The recent outbreak of Bilharzia in schools in Tzaneen, Maruleng

and Giyani are caused by polluted water in rivers. Action in

reducing river pollution is needed.

Angy Pholane

COGSHTA

1.DWS has supported MDM through the DPSA to have water master

plan and WSDP. The lack of implementation of plans is a challenge

in the municipality.

2.Issues.

•MDM has no asset care.

•Project completed and not functioning.

•Planning and implementing projects without including

another stakeholder, example Eskom.

•The issue of vandalism and theft, which goes back to

community engagement and involvement of the TA to

take ownership of infrastructure.

•Poor performance of contractors.

•Billing issues.

•In terms of water resources and water provision, they

have to draft the short- and medium-term goals for all

projects to be able to push for improvements.

Dr Shafick Adams

WRC

1.If we all say infrastructure is the main challenge, then why is no

one asking what is causing the infrastructure to become degraded,

because if you are losing 50% because of the infrastructure it

becomes worse.

2.What another project can they start? And how can they take them

to the communities and look basic? This is the problem.

3.If the MDM is not starting from the 50% leaking water and find the

root cause and challenges. To also look at what resilient

infrastructure can be used to replace it.

4.As part of the resolution the RPI department needs to look at what

is causing specific infrastructure to fail in specific context and

come up with innovations, because this is a global problem not

MDM problem.

5.WRC and its partners are gifting a blueprint through the Giyani

Local Scale Climate Resilience Programme, which is evidence

based.

6.MDM has to start looking at the problem in a systemic approach

instead of fragmenting the problem.

7.How to adopt and out scale the GLSCRP to other villages, how to

replicate it.

Lebogang Sebola

LNW

1.Intensify efforts in implementation of water conservation and

demand management, example in terms of illegal connection, do

they cut them out or legalize them by putting them on a meter and

billing the users.

2.Institutionally, bills must be accurate and offer uninterrupted

services.

Erna Kruger

MDF

1.Speaking from community perspective, while deliberating trying to

get the bulk infrastructure in, which takes 15 years not to happen.

Villagers have to get supplies somehow, they need water every day

and we worried about how they can pay, while you don’t give them

any water at all.

2.They make their own water arrangements, which are regarded as

illegal connection.

3.The bigger issue is that no one is looking at the system as a whole,

boreholes and rivers are drying out, they go higher into the

mountains to collect water through their pipes.

4.Communities know that they are in a crisis mode, and they are

open to starting to discuss issues, they are prepared to do this

thing. Seeing them as a problem is a problem.

5.Integrated climate resource management is very important.

6.A groundwater management process is needed.

7.MDM needs to think about the people they’re supposed to be

serving.

2.Panel members shared their perspectives on the prioritization of issues raised during the sessions

and offered insights on how they might reframe these priorities based on their expertise. Finally,

the discussion concluded with strategic advice for MDM's planning in 2025, with a particular

emphasis on sustainable and innovative approaches to water and sanitation.

Dialogue: Comments and discussion from the floor

3.After the panel members made their statements discussion was taken form the floor with panel

members commenting.

Record of discussion:

Ramatsi J

MDM

1.Mopani district has 354 villages, 90% of the villages rely on groundwater which are

boreholes.

2.The borehole system is not sustainable due to Climate change. Already 80% of

boreholes are said to be drying out, and there are boreholes that are not producing

water already.

3.What could be the alternative that DWS can advise for water resource.

4.By-laws are not enforced.

5.The issue of rivers that are barricaded by big farmers, which are stopping the flow of

water to other rivers. How can DWS intervene in helping MDM with this issue.

MMC M Mangena

MDM

Appreciating the approach ofdialogue where stakeholders come togethertodiscuss water

issues.

1.All issues and solutions discussed here should be added to the next Strategic session.

2.Why are small scale farmers not able to access water rights?

3.Do they have maps of all the infrastructure of both the old and new system

implemented, to make it easy for operation and maintenance?

Albertina

Rammallo

MDM

Appreciating all the inputs and comments.

1.Initiatives that are in the communities. Communities are able to collect or come up

with means for water provision as panelists discussed, which becomes difficult for the

municipality to bill them.

2.These kinds of communities have to be acknowledged and give them more support.

3.The MDM can give more support to these kinds of communities in terms of support, of

water tanks, disinfecting the water sources.

4.What will we be billing communities for? Because the municipality cannot provide

water for them 24 hours, according to the national water act.

5.The municipality can pilot a billing system in rural areas, where they don’t have a flat

rate, but assist with infrastructure and resources. Rising awareness in terms cost

recovery that needs to be done to maintain the system and including the Tribal

Authorities to be in charge of collecting the revenue from the community provided

that the system provides villagers with water 24 hours, that will go to the municipality

and the TA.

6.Communities with initiatives for water provision need to be supported.

Vusi Khoza

GGLM MM

Appreciating the inputs and the dialogue.

1.Issues of infrastructure security due to theft and vandalism have to be discussed more.

Can’t the MDM ask for housing from a TA to house or have an agreement written on

paper that a specific household will house certain infrastructure that will be used by

the community.

2.Discussion of water theft by people selling water in communities, where they are

getting water. By-laws enforcement is needed.

3.Issues of failing communication are also the key problem.

Lebogang Selane

Issues to deal with:

1.Water recycling

2.Water conservation and demand management

3.Embracing for IR

4.In rural communities they need to install communal pre-paid meters to ensure that

people use water responsibly.

5.Municipality to do proper assess boreholes and groundwater.

6.Over abstraction of boreholes has an environmental impact.

7.Community involvement. Allowing communities to take ownership of infrastructure.

Shafick Adams

WRC

1.Groundwater resources are not the problem; the problem is management.

2.MDM has no hydrologist while 90% of the villages they serve depend on groundwater,

how do they expect to deliver sustainable water to the people, while they are using a

system that requires expect management.

3.The municipality should employ three hydrologists at a minimum.

4.Limpopo is famous for giving drilling tenders to construction companies.

Edson

Warambwa

MISA

1.Maps presented by Dr. Peje have shown gradual increase of drought. Climate change is

affecting boreholes and it’s a reality.

2.Public funds can’t be used on private property.

3.On the issue of asset management. They want to develop and implement an asset

management plan, prioritizing assets to be retired or replaced in line with the

legislation on government assets and make sure that the assets comply with MFMA.

4.They must learn from what Gauteng has done. They have done trans scheme of water

from Lesotho to Gauteng by Rand water.

5.Water is needed for industrial use and farming activities.

6.Mozambique has water which requires desalination plant which needs to come with

Mopani.

7.Across Zimbabwe there are dams on the southern part of Zimbabwe, inter-catchment

transition is already negotiated with the government of Zimbabwe. Water must be

transferred from other regions to Mopani.

Lebogang Selane

Univof Limpopo

1.The representatives from UL highlighted their academic focus, particularly a BSc

program in water and sanitation, covering sanitation processes, water treatment, and

resource management. They expressed interest in future collaborations with RDIU to

further these efforts.

Angy Pholane

COGHSTA

1.Issues with Mopani are inwards, their planning, implementations, Applications and

reference number, which have to be dealt with.

Cecilia Mashaba

DWS

1.Mopani needs a specialist in geo-hydrology.

2.Mopani uses 60% of groundwater.

3.In terms of Middle Letaba, Mopani needs to voice out the existence of lawful users.

Erna Kruger

MDF

1.A suggestion, in terms of research and innovation, participatory innovation through

community engagements.

Lebogang

Sebola

LNW

1.Mopani needs to have a database of community initiative for water provision.

Edson

Warambwa

MISA

1.Invite should be extended to other stakeholders, Dept. of Health and Eskom, in the

next dialogue

2.WRC did a good work in Giyani, a resolution to upscale it to others local municipality is

needed, Maruleng, Letaba and Ba-Phalaborwa has been proposed, because it has had

an impact of job creation, entrepreneurs and water access.

Mopani District Municipality responds

In this section we gather together the responses from the various Mopani District Members that

attended the event.

CLLR Mangena (designation: MMC Agriculture and Environmental Management Services)

Mangena emphasized that planning alone is not sufficient evidence to address challenges

effectively. He called for a response from RIU to align with this perspective and highlighted the

critical need for hydrogeology expertise within institutional frameworks to bolster water

management efforts.

Cllr Mboweni (designation: Speaker GGLM)

Cllr Mboweni expressed appreciation for the discussions while addressing the dire water crisis

affecting resources. He pointed out the challenges posed by unregulated water sales by vendors

(Machandies) and unregulated boreholes within communities, which undermine structured water

management systems.

Cllr Baloyi (designation:MMC Economic Development, Housing and Spatial Planning)

MMC Baloyi stressed the importance of a unified social compact where all stakeholders work

collaboratively toward practical goals, stating that RIU can play a pivotal role in achieving these

outcomes. He acknowledged the value of dialogues but recommended limiting political

participation to a single day for efficiency. He also appreciated the current assessment of water

resources and asset reports while questioning their developmental rigor. Furthermore, he suggested

forming a team within the IGR to consolidate the outcomes of this event.

Mr V Khoza (designation: Municipal Manager GGLM)

MM Giyani emphasized the importance of frank and honest discussions on what is being done to

achieve water management goals. He proposed that the next dialogue include additional partners

such as the Department of Health, Eskom, and community representatives. He stressed that the

documentation must convey the communities' water needs while presenting them as integral to the

solution.

Cllr Sefufi (designation: MMC Water Services)

Sefufi discussed the issue of private household borehole infrastructure being appropriated by

residents for personal use.

She explained that funding for geohydrologists is unfeasible since boreholes are only temporary

solutions.

She emphasized the need to extend water consumption locations to underserved areas like

Sekororo, Letaba, and Phalaborwa, and proposed innovative projects such as the Mountain Stream

Project and atmospheric abstraction (cloud seeding) as potential solutions.

Resolutions included implementing the Letaba bulk water solution for GaMapalle, despite the lack

of aquifers in the region, and enforcing payment systems for communities receiving 24-hour water

supply.

4SECTION 4 Analysis and synthesis of data

In this section we provide and analysis of the various data that came available during the Water

Dialogues. This analysis forms the basis for a deliberation process amongst the organising

committee as well as the relevant persons from the MDM. That process will recommend the steps in

taking recommendations tocouncil and ultimately the MDM Strategic Planning session in 2025.

Data analysis

The following analytical framework was applied to the data:

1.Categorization of Challenges, Innovations and Resolutions: Group the data into common

categories or themes. This helps in understanding the frequency of each response type.

2.Frequency Analysis: Count how many times each challenge was mentioned to identify the

most common and least common data.

3.Qualitative Analysis: For open-ended responses, a qualitative analysis using thematic coding

to extract patterns or recurring themes.

4.Outliers: Identify any unique or rare challenges that were mentioned only a few times, as

these could represent outliers or emerging issues.

Challenges

Data from the breakaway session was analysed using the analytical framework and presented the

graph below

The chart above visualizes the frequency of challenges identified in water management and

infrastructure based on the provided data. Key observations:

4.2.1 Summary of the frequency analysis of challenges identified by participants

Most Frequently Mentioned Challenges:

1.O & M (Operations & Maintenance): 7 mentions

2.Limited Water Resources: 5 mentions

3.Allocation: 4 mentions

4.Limited Infrastructure: 4 mentions

Moderately Mentioned Challenges:

•Aging Infrastructure, Funding, Practices, Skills, and Vandalism: 3 mentions each

•Community Involvement, Cost Recovery, Energising of Boreholes, Enforcement,

Planning, Spatial Planning, Unlawful Practices, Water Tankers: 2 mentions each

•Borehole Management, Climate, Climate Impacts, Collaboration, Effluent Discharge,

Governance Systems, Groundwater Management, Incompetent Services Provider,

Management Practices, Monitoring, Motivation, Political Issues, Poor Systems,

Procurement, Project Management: 1 mention each

This analysis highlights the recurring concerns (O & M and water resource limitations) as well as

unique challenges that might need special attention or further exploration.

This data seems to offer more details on specific challenges, especially around water access,

infrastructure, governance, and technical capacity.

4.2.2 Expanded analysis:

1.Infrastructure-Related Issues:

oAging Infrastructure: Issues related to outdated systems were mentioned multiple

times, e.g., "Aging infrastructure" and "Treatment Plant Old." It continues to

highlight the concern over aging facilities needing upgrades.

oLimited or Poor Infrastructure: Includes mentions of "Limited infrastructure,"

"Poor Planning," and "Low level of infrastructure development." Infrastructure

limitations are repeated, particularly in rural and under-resourced areas.

oVandalism and Theft: This issue reappears in both datasets, indicating a consistent

problem with the protection and maintenance of existing infrastructure.

2.Water Access and Management:

oAllocation Challenges: Includes mentions of "No equitable share of water" and

"Inadequate allocation of water." The fairness in water distribution, especially in

rural contexts, seems to be a recurring theme.

oWater Resource Limitations: This includes repeated references to "Limited water

resources" and new mentions like "Not enough above-ground water resources." It

emphasizes both availability and the need for better management of current

resources.

oBorehole and Well Management: "Poor borehole management" reappears,

highlighting contamination risks due to inadequate management and maintenance

practices.

oDrought and Seasonal Variation: New mentions of drought and its impact on water

access link climate variability directly to the challenges faced.

3.Governance and Institutional Challenges:

oCollaboration Issues: The lack of collaboration between local government and

communities highlights governance gaps, repeated in phrases like "Lack of

collaboration" and "Limitations in appointing communities as intermediaries."

oPolitical and Institutional Interference: This includes specific cases like "Political

interference" and "Poor institutional tools," indicating struggles with governance

structures that hinder effective water management.

oCost Recovery and Budget Constraints: References to financial limitations, such as

"Cost recovery," "Budget constraints," and "No budget for specific villages," suggest

financial sustainability is a key barrier.

4.Operation and Maintenance (O&M):

oThis category remains prominent with concerns about planning, incomplete

projects, and a shortage of qualified personnel for maintenance tasks, which

directly affect service delivery.

5.Social and Community Involvement:

oCommunity Involvement and Capacity: New mentions like "Low level of

infrastructure development" and "Lack of willingness by officials to implement

solutions" point to challenges in community engagement and local empowerment.

oIllegal Activities: Issues like "illegal water connections" and "water mafias" suggest

a need for stricter regulation and enforcement.

Additional Observations:

•Emergency Responses: References to "Emergency Water Tankers" reflect a reactive

approach to water scarcity issues, pointing to the need for more sustainable, long-term

solutions.

•Technical Capacity: Mentions of "inadequate technical skills" and "incapacity of personnel"

reinforce that training and capacity-building are critical to addressing these challenges.

•Environmental Considerations: New mentions of "flood irrigation" under "Poor Agricultural

practices" indicate the environmental impact of current water management practices,

potentially leading to unsustainable use.

4.2.3 Insights from data on challenges:

1.Core Issues: Infrastructure limitations, governance and management challenges, financial

constraints, and climate impacts are the most persistent themes across both datasets.

2.Common Patterns: A pattern of inadequate planning, poor enforcement, and insufficient

local capacity emerges, highlighting systemic issues in the water supply and management

sectors.

3.Potential Outliers: Issues like "water mafias" and "illegal water tankers" suggest unique,

possibly localized, challenges that may not be universally applicable but indicate

governance failures in specific areas.

Recommendations and proposed resolutions

The data provided includes a list of recommended actions and issues to address regarding water

management and climate resilience. Below is an analysis based on frequency and emerging

patterns.

Figure 6 Visualisation of proposed resolution areas for council consideration

4.3.1 Frequency Distribution

The categories are ranked based on how often they were mentioned, indicating priority or emphasis

in the proposed resolutions:

1.Operations & Maintenance (O & M): 6 mentions

2.Train & Capacitate: 6 mentions

3.Design, Install, Innovate: 4 mentions

4.Investigate and Research: 4 mentions

5.Enforce: 3 mentions

6.Financial Planning: 3 mentions

7.Involve and Collaborate: 3 mentions

8.Develop: 2 mentions

9.Diversify and Plan: 2 mentions

10.Project Planning: 2 mentions

11.Strategic Planning: 2 mentions

12.Allocation: 1 mention

Resolutions

13.Expansion and Installation: 1 mention

14.Implement New Practices: 1 mention

15.Improve and Upgrade: 1 mention

16.Monitor: 1 mention

4.3.2 Analysis of Priority Areas

1.Top Priority: O & M and Training & Capacity Building

oOperations & Maintenance (O & M) and Train & Capacitate are the most

frequently mentioned, indicating they are seen as foundational for the successful

implementation of any project.

▪O & M suggests a focus on ensuring that existing systems are well-

maintained and sustainable over time.

▪Training emphasizes the need for capacity building, skills development, and

strengthening local knowledge to handle ongoing and future projects.

2.Moderate Priority: Design, Innovation, Research, and Enforcement

oDesign, Install, Innovate and Investigate and Research rank next, suggesting that

there is a need for innovation in design and a solid understanding of the current

conditions before taking actions.

oEnforce, Financial Planning, and Involve and Collaborate each have three

mentions, highlighting the importance of enforcement of regulations, financial

management, and collaborative efforts to drive successful projects.

3.Lower Priority: Planning and Development

oProject Planning, Strategic Planning, Develop, and Diversify and Plan each have

two mentions, reflecting a mid-level priority on creating comprehensive plans and

strategies that include diversification and general development goals.

oSpecific Actions and Monitoring. The categories Allocation, Expansion and

Installation, Implement New Practices, Improve and Upgrade, and Monitor each

have a single mention. These actions, though important, may be seen as specific

tasks within broader strategic objectives or as specialized needs.

4.3.3 Key Themes Identified

1.Capacity Building and Operation and Maintenance are crucial to the success of ongoing

and future initiatives. These aspects are seen as the cornerstone for resilience and

sustainability.

2.Research and Innovation play a significant role, suggesting that stakeholders value a

strong understanding of local conditions and are open to new, innovative solutions.

3.Financial and Regulatory Aspects (enforcement and financial planning) show the necessity

of a structured and well-managed implementation.

4.Collaborative Planning and Development emphasizes the importance of inclusive planning

processes, strategic foresight, and diverse delivery models.

Detailed analysis of key themes

1.Operations and Maintenance (O&M)

oO&M is emphasized heavily throughout the data, highlighting its critical role in

ensuring the sustainability of water and sanitation systems. Multiple mentions of

O&M suggest a priority on maintaining existing infrastructure, monitoring

performance, and budgeting for regular repairs.

oSpecific mentions include creating an O&M budget, maintaining both micro and

macro systems, and a general focus on continuous operation and maintenance.

2.Infrastructure Development and Innovation

oThere is a clear emphasis on infrastructure improvements and innovative

solutions, particularly those that address climate change and enhance resilience:

▪Implementation of climate-smart resilient infrastructure.

▪Expansion of solar-based systems for sustainable energy solutions.

▪Improving water storage infrastructure to secure resources for diverse

uses.

▪Developing security systems for solar installations indicates a concern for

safeguarding technology investments.

3.Resource Diversification and Security

oDiversification of water resources is a recurring theme, with a focus on securing

water availability through multiple approaches:

▪Groundwater assessments and comprehensive surface water audits

highlight the need to understand resource availability and make informed

decisions.

▪Development of a water security dashboard suggests the importance of

centralized monitoring and data-driven management.

4.Financial Management and Budget Allocation

oProper budgeting and financial planning are central, including:

▪Utilization of a percentage of the Municipal Infrastructure Grant (MIG)

specifically for repairs, maintenance, and asset management.

▪Emphasis on enabling action with adequate resources, stressing the need

forbudget allocations to support proposed activities.

5.Community Involvement and Stakeholder Engagement

oThere is a strong focus on involving local communities and stakeholders:

▪Involvement of communities in planning sessions emphasizes the

importance of participatory approaches.

▪The mention of sectoral meetings to discuss possible solutions indicates a

collaborative effort between various stakeholders.

▪Collaboration with research institutions (via MoUs) underscores the value

of knowledge-sharing and evidence-based strategies.

6.Capacity Building and Skills Development

oTraining and skill development are seen as essential for sustainability:

▪Strengthening capacity for planning, capacitating borehole operators, and

addressing scarce technical skills are critical areas.

▪Strengthening water forums and DDM (District Development Model)

suggests a need to empower local leadership and governance structures for

effective implementation.

7.Policy, Governance, and Regulation

oEnforcement and governance are also highlighted as priorities:

▪There are explicit references to enforcing municipal bylaws and dealing

with pollution of water resources.

▪Aligning the Water Services Development Plan (WSDP) with future

developmental road maps suggests a forward-looking approach to policy

alignment.

▪Compliance with DWS directives and the integration of court orders point

to legal frameworks guiding water management actions.

8.Strategic Planning and Monitoring

oPlanning and monitoring are emphasized for project success:

▪Specific actions like setting timelines, identifying strategic challenges, and

proposing solutions indicate a structured project management approach.

▪The mention of disease response points to the intersection of water

management and public health, underlining the importance of

preparedness.

9.Support for Indigenous and Local Responses

oThere is a notable emphasis on indigenous responses and local knowledge:

▪Finding ways to support indigenous responses highlights the recognition of

traditional practices and their potential value in contemporary water

management.

▪This aligns with the broader focus on involving local communities and

understanding the local context.

Recommendations

1.Operational and Maintenance Framework: Establish a clear and well-funded O&M

framework that ensures continuous system functionality, with a specific O&M budget and

clear guidelines for both macro and micro systems.

2.Capacity Building for Technical staff and communities: Focus on training local

stakeholders,operators, and communities to enhance their capacity to manage, operate,

and maintain water systems effectively. Address gaps in technical skills to ensure local self-

sufficiency.

3.Infrastructure and Innovation: Invest in climate-smart infrastructure, expand renewable

energy solutions, and ensure water security through advanced monitoring tools like water

security dashboards. Safeguard investments with proper security systems.

4.Community-Centric Approaches: Involving communities in planning and decision-making

processes is a recurring theme, recognizing the value of local knowledge and ensuring that

solutions are context-specific.

5.Financial and Policy Alignment: Ensure that financial resources are adequately allocated

to key areas like maintenance and infrastructure upgrades. Align policies with

developmental goals, enforce regulations, and comply with national directives for coherent

management.

6.Inclusive and Evidence-Based Decision-Making: Involve communities, traditional leaders,

and local stakeholders in planning and decision-making. Support indigenous knowledge

systems while basing actions on solid research data, audits, and assessments

Panel member contributions

This section organizes and aligns the key points raised by each panellist during the Mopani Water

Dialogue with broader issues and proposed solutions. It integrates their insights into the overall

recommendations, ensuring that each panellist’s contributions are reflected in the final set of

strategic actions.

4.4.1 Cecilia Mashaba (Department of Water and Sanitation - DWS)

Key Issues Raised:

•Asset Management and Infrastructure Maintenance:

oThe lack of an asset register and asset care in Mopani.

oThe slow pace of action despite the availability of funding through MIG grants (R30

million), which has not been fully utilized.

oProactive maintenance is needed to ensure long-term sustainability of water

systems.

•Wastewater and Pollution:

oThe continued release ofuntreated wastewater into rivers, causing pollution and

health risks.

oThe urgent need to address water pollution issues, especially related to wastewater

treatment.

Aligned Recommendations:

•Asset Management and Maintenance:

oUtilize MIG Funds for O&M: Allocate 10% of MIG funds for repairs and maintenance

and 5% for asset management, as suggested by Cecilia Mashaba. This ensures that

funding is directed toward fixing existing infrastructure and properly maintaining it.

oCreate an Asset Register and O&M Budget: Develop a comprehensive asset register

and create a dedicated O&M budget to manage, repair, and replace water

infrastructure effectively.

oProactive Maintenance Plan: Develop a long-term proactive maintenance plan to

address infrastructure failures and ensure the sustainability of water systems.

•Water Pollution and Wastewater Treatment:

oUrgent Action on Pollution: Enforce the DWS directives and court orders to halt

pollution from wastewater treatment plants. Immediate action is required to

prevent further contamination of rivers and to address public health concerns.

oImprovement of Wastewater Treatment Systems: Implement better wastewater

treatment technologies to reduce environmental impact and prevent river

pollution.

4.4.2 Edson Warambwa (MISA - Municipal Infrastructure Support Agent)

Key Issues Raised:

•Lack of Implementation and Planning:

oMDM has developed water master plans and Water Services Development Plans

(WSDPs), but these plans are not being implemented.

oThe municipality struggles with poor project planning and a lack of stakeholder

inclusion (e.g., Eskom).

•Pollution and Legal Concerns:

oRiver pollution from untreated wastewater and the ongoing legal battles over

pollution are major issues.

•Asset Management Issues:

oThe underutilization of available MIG funds for repairs and infrastructure

development.

Aligned Recommendations:

•Implementation of Water Master Plans:

oEnforce Planning and Implementation: Ensure that water master plans and WSDPs

are implemented by setting clear deadlines and identifying specific action owners.

oSectoral Meetings for Solutions: Organize sectoral meetings with relevant

stakeholders (e.g., Eskom, DWS, and contractors) to discuss the implementation of

water projects and improve coordination.

•Water Pollution Control:

oAddress River Pollution: Actively work on resolving the river pollution issue by

focusing on improving wastewater treatment processes and collaborating with

farmers to prevent further contamination.

•Asset Management:

oPrioritize MIG Funds for O&M and Asset Management: As suggested by Cecilia

Mashaba, allocate the available MIG funds for asset management and repairs to

improve infrastructure maintenance.

4.4.3 Erna Kruger (Mahlathini Development Foundation - MDF)

Key Issues Raised:

•Water Resource Management:

oHeavy reliance on boreholes (90% of villages depend on groundwater), which is

becoming unsustainable due to climate change and over-extraction.

oMany boreholes are drying out, and there are inadequate assessments of

groundwater availability.

•Lack of Resilient Infrastructure:

oThe borehole system’s unsustainability, with 80% of boreholes drying up, requires

the development of more resilient water systems.

•Community Initiatives:

oLocal communities are already trying to provide their own water through informal

systems, which the municipality should support and formalize.

Aligned Recommendations:

•Sustainable Groundwater Management:

oConduct Groundwater Assessments: Before expanding groundwater-based

systems, conduct thorough groundwater assessments to determine availability and

sustainability. Implement groundwater management strategies to avoid over-

extraction.

oDiversify Water Resources: Move away from sole reliance on boreholes by

exploring other water sources such as surface water, rainwater harvesting, and

desalination.

•Climate-Resilient Infrastructure:

oInvest in Climate-Smart Infrastructure: Design and implement resilient water

infrastructure thatcan adapt to changing climatic conditions, especially for rural

communities reliant on boreholes.

•Support Community Water Initiatives:

oFormalize and Support Community Systems: Recognize and support indigenous

water management practices and informal community-led systems by providing

resources, such as water tanks and technical assistance, to enhance their

effectiveness.

4.4.4 Angy Pholane (COGHSTA)

Key Issues Raised:

•Infrastructure Failure:

oInfrastructure is deteriorating rapidly, and 50% of the water is being lost due to

leaks, poor maintenance, and lack of proper infrastructure management.

•Systemic Water Management Approach:

oThe need for a systemic approach to address the root causes of infrastructure

failure, instead of piecemeal interventions.

•Resilient Infrastructure and Climate Adaptation:

oThere is a need to explore innovative, resilient infrastructure solutions that can

withstand the impacts of climate change.

Aligned Recommendations:

•Address Infrastructure Loss and Failures:

oLeakage Reduction: Focus on identifying and repairing infrastructure leaks that

result in significant water loss. Prioritize the repair of leaking pipes and systems.

oResilient Infrastructure: Invest in climate-smart, resilient water infrastructure that

can withstand extreme weather events and long-term climate variability.

•Systemic Approach to Water Management:

oIntegrated Resource Management: Implement an integrated approach to water

resource management that addresses both the immediate challenges (e.g.,

infrastructure) and long-term sustainability (e.g., groundwater and surface water

management).

oInnovative Solutions for Infrastructure Failure: Implement innovations such as

using alternative materials or energy-efficient systems (e.g., solar-powered pumps)

to improve infrastructure resilience.

4.4.5 Shafick Adams (Water Research Commission - WRC)

Key Issues Raised:

•Water Conservation and Demand Management:

oEmphasized the importance of water conservation, particularly addressing illegal

water connections and improving billing systems.

•Institutional Challenges:

oThe municipality’s failure to implement water conservation and demand

management strategies.

•Lack of Cross-Sector Collaboration:

oMDM’s failure to include all relevant stakeholders (e.g., Eskom) in project planning.

Aligned Recommendations:

•Water Conservation and Demand Management:

oAddress Illegal Connections: Implement strategies to address illegal water

connections by either removing them or legalizing them and installing meters.

oImprove Billing Systems: Implement a fair, accurate, and transparent billing

system, especially in rural areas where water access is inconsistent. Introduce pre-

paid meters in rural areas as a means of controlling consumption and ensuring

payment.

•Cross-Sector Collaboration:

oStakeholder Inclusion in Planning: Ensure that all relevant stakeholders, including

Eskom and other service providers, are involved in the planning and implementation

of water projects.

4.4.6 Lebogang Sebola (Lepelle Northern Water)

Key Issues Raised:

•Community Water Security:

oCommunities often create their own water supply systems, but these are often

informal and not recognized by the municipality, leading to challenges with water

access, billing, and legal connections.

•Systemic Water Delivery:

oA lack of comprehensive planning and systemic deliverysystems for water in rural

areas.

•Water Resource Depletion:

oGroundwater and surface water resources are becoming increasingly scarce, which

exacerbates water delivery challenges.

Aligned Recommendations:

•Community Involvement and Water Security:

oSupport Community Water Initiatives: Formalize community-driven water systems

by providing technical and financial support. Equip communities with the necessary

tools and resources to manage local water systems effectively.

oWater Tanker Program: Implement a water tanker program for rural communities

where fixed infrastructure is not available.

•Systemic Water Delivery Models:

oDiversify Delivery Models: Implement diverse water delivery models that are

tailored to rural areas, such as solar-powered water pumps, community boreholes,

and water tankers.

oEncourage Community Ownership: Facilitate a transition to community-managed

water systems, where locals have a direct role in decision-making and

maintenance.

The Panel Members highlighted critical issues related to water distribution, infrastructure,

pollution, and groundwater management, with solutions proposed by different panel members. The

recommendations emphasize a combination of asset management, sustainable water resource

management, community engagement, and cross-sector collaboration to address Mopani’s water

challenges. Key points of integration include:

•Proactive Infrastructure Maintenance with proper asset management and funding

utilization.

•Water Pollution and Wastewater Management are urgent priorities.

•Sustainable Groundwater and Climate-Resilient Infrastructure should be prioritized.

•Community-Driven Water Security and empowerment are essential for long-term water

access.

By combining the contributions from all panel members, a holistic, integrated approach to water

management can be adopted, ensuring that Mopani’s water systems are sustainable, equitable, and

resilient to future challenges.

5SECTION 5: Proposed areas for resolutions

Based on the data and analysis above the following areas are presented as proposed areas for

consideration by decision making structures within Mopani District Municipality. There are

suggested areas for consideration. Some of these issues might be better suited as operation matters

to be dealt with alternatively.

These resolutions aim to cover all aspects of water management, from equitable access and

resource planning to technical capacity building and system maintenance. They provide a

comprehensive framework for effective governance in the MDM.

Water Allocation, Security, and Resource Management that

recognises scarcity

•Resolution: Prioritizing equitable water allocation and ensuring efficient management of

limited water resources.

oResource Diversification: Reduce dependency on a single source by diversifying

water resources to enhance system resilience especially in rural communities.

oEquitable Water Distribution: Ensure fair allocation for multiple uses, prioritizing

equitable access for allcommunities under limited availability

oWater Conservation and Water Demand Management: Develop and implement

comprehensive WCWDM plans

oWater Monitoring Dashboard: Create a centralized dashboard to monitor and

improve water resource management and delivery.

oComprehensive Assessments: Conduct groundwater assessments and surface water

audits to guide sustainable management.

Climate-Smart Infrastructure in Water Services Delivery

•Resolution: Building climate resilience through infrastructure projects and climate-smart

practices.

oClimate-Smart Tools: Develop and promote climate-smart tools and techniques in

delivery to enhance resilience.

oResilient Infrastructure: Invest in infrastructure projects designed to withstand

climate impacts, including upgrades to water storage systems.

oClimate-Resilient Development: Align the Water Services Development Plan with

developmental road maps to ensure long-term coherence.

Solar Systems and Sustainable Energy Use

•Resolution: Implement and safeguard solar energy use for sustainable water supply.

oSolar System Expansion: Increase the use of solar-based systems for sustainable

water supply.

oSecurity Measures: Implement robust security systems for solar installations to

prevent theft and damage.

Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Planning

•Resolution: Establish an operation and maintenance framework to safeguard water

infrastructure.

oO&M Framework: Establish an effective framework for the consistent maintenance

of water infrastructure.

oBudget Allocation: Allocate a dedicated budget for O&M, including a portion of the

Municipal Infrastructure Grant for repairs and asset management.

oRegular Maintenance: Ensure systematic upkeep of both micro and macro water

systems to prevent breakdowns.

Stakeholder and Community collaboration

•Resolution: Establish a collaboration and co-management framework with stakeholders and

local communities to ensure effective water management.

oSectoral Collaboration: Convene regular meetings with stakeholders to discuss

solutions to water and sanitation challenges.

oCommunity Involvement: Actively engage local communities in management to

ensure contextually appropriate projects with local support.

oStrengthening Forums and Dialogues: Enhance Water Forums and Water Dialogues

to foster collaboration between stakeholders and facilitate community

participation.

Decentralisation Delivery Models and Water Access, Specifically

Support Self-Supply Models

•Resolution: Diversifying water delivery methods and decentralisation to address

community-specific needs.

oDiversified Delivery: Implement various water delivery models tailored to the

needs of different communities, including water tankers for emergency supply.

oManagement training: training for models for shared responsibility

Governance, Compliance, and Accountability

•Resolution: Strengthening governance, ensuring compliance, and improving accountability

in water management.

oRegulatory Compliance: Enforce adherence to municipal bylaws and Departmentof

Water and Sanitation directives.

oProject Accountability: Create detailed project plans with clear timelines,

responsibilities, and deliverables.

oStrategic Planning: Identify and address key challenges in water and sanitation,

aligning them with targeted strategies

oCo-management and Services Level Agreements: to further project management

actions at appropriate levels.

Financial Management and Resource Allocation

•Resolution: Expanding effective and innovative financial models and protocols to enhance

resource allocationfor sustainable water management.

oCross-Subsidization: Implement financial strategies to balance funding needs and

ensure sustainability.

oTimely Resource Allocation: Ensure the allocation of necessary resources,

including budgets, for water projects and interventions.

Capacity Building and Skills Development

•Resolution: Investing in capacity building and skills development to enhance water and

sanitation management.

oPlanning Capacity: Enhance planning skills through capacity-building initiatives in

water and sanitation management.

oTraining Programs: Develop specialized training for boreholeoperators and other

technical roles.

oDistrict Development Model: Strengthen the District Development Model to

support integrated water management at the district level.

Research, Innovation, and Local Knowledge

•Resolution: Promoting research, innovation, and indigenous knowledge for sustainable

water solutions.

oResearch Partnerships: Form Memorandums of Understanding with research

institutions to drive innovation and evidence-based practices.

oIndigenous Knowledge: Support indigenous knowledge systems to improve local

water management strategies.

oUpscaling WRC Projects: Expand successful Water Research Commission projects to

reach additional local municipalities.

Water Pollution Control, Disease Preparedness and Response

Systems

•Resolution: Integrated and comprehensive framework for protecting water resources from

pollution and enhancing response to water-related health risks.

oPollution Mitigation: Implement proactive measures to prevent and address water

pollution, safeguarding public health.

oDisease Response: Strengthen infrastructure and planning to respond quickly to

water-borne diseases.

Monitoring, Reporting, and Continuous Improvement

•Resolution: Incorporating innovative technologies for ensuring regular, and effective

monitoring and reporting to drive continuous improvements in water management.

oResource Reporting: Utilize GRIP reports to inform decision-making on

groundwater management.

oSystem Audits: Regularly assess infrastructure performance to guide maintenance

and improvements.

oProject Scaling: Upscale impactful initiatives to maximize their benefits across

multiple communities.

6SECTION 6: Synthesis of key issues to be taken forward

This section to be completed after discussion with the organising committee and relevant persons

in MDM. This process requires the selection of relevant content as well as the decisions as to

whether items are resolutions or operational by nature. Also some items are processes whilst others

are project based

Convert selected analysis items to actionable resolutions:

Example 1

1.Resolution on Solar System Expansion: Expand the installation and use of solar-powered water

supply systems to enhance sustainable access to water.

1.Prioritize areas with limited grid access, ensuring reliable, eco-friendly, and cost-

effective solutions.

2.Establish a dedicated budget for the deployment, maintenance, and security of solar

systems to safeguard infrastructure and ensure long-term functionality

7SECTION 7: Process plan and map for way forward

This section to be completed after establishing the road map for adoption of proposals

Example of roadmap

•Consolidate outcomes of the Water Dialogues

•Synthesise proposals for resolutionand operational actions

•Present findings at DMF

•Integrate responses

•Present integrated report to IGR

•Incorporate inputs

4•Prepare submission for 2025 strategic planning

8Appendices

Programme

Data sheets