| 1
Acknowledgements
The USAID Resilient WatersProgram is funded by theU.S. Agency for International Developmentand
implemented by Chemonics International Inc. Fixed amountaward No. RWP-G3-MDF is a sub-grant
implemented by Mahlathini Development Foundation.
© Mahlathini Development Foundation (MDF)
2 Forresters Lane
Pietermaritzburg, 3201
KZN, South Africa
T (+27)828732289
W www.mahlathini.org
Company Reg. No. 2016/285787/08 (2016)
Non-profit org. Reg. No. 930051028 (2015)
DUNS No. 539 162 399
ABOUT THE PROJECT
Community based climate change adaptation for increased
water productivity and food security for improved rural
livelihoods in the Lower Olifants basin
MILESTONE 5: Review and networking (1): Progress
Report.
07/04/2021
MILESTONE 5: REVIEW AND NETWORKING (1): PROGRESS REPORT.
| 2
Mahlathini Development Foundation (MDF) is a small public benefit non-profit organization consisting of
ruraldevelopment practitioners who specialize in participatory learning and action processes, sustainable
natural resource management and low external input farming systems, including a focus on rain water
harvesting, conservation agriculture, intensive homestead food production, food security,climate change
adaptation micro finance and enterprise development.
MDF designs andimplements rural development programmes and training processes providing learning
processes for adults all the way from semi- literate farmers to post graduate university level. We work in
partnership with government and non-government organisations alike. We are sensitive to and mainstream
where possible gender, disability and people living with HIV/AIDs.
Climate variability and climate change (increased temperature, increased variability in rainfall patterns,
increased intensity of storms and increased drought) have far reaching effects on the lives and livelihoods
of the rural poor.Climate change poses a significant threat to South Africa’s water resources, food security,
health, infrastructure, ecosystem services and biodiversity.
This project intends to effect processes for community-based climate change adaptation (CB-CCA) for
improved livelihoods and resilience for project participants through introduction and implementation of
climate resilient agricultural (CRA) practices, building of social agency and stakeholder platforms and
support for alternative income generation opportunities.
The Innovation Systems methodological approach for this project focuses on local level learning groups and
individual and group experimentation toincrease local capacity and agency in building systems forfood
security and rural livelihoods.
As a first step, a village level assessment ofclimate change impacts and general natural resource use
patterns are done. Secondly, an analysisof adaptive strategies and associated practices provides the
platform forimplementation of locally derived and prioritized activities and CSA practices. Thirdly, the
learning groups provide the organizationalplatforms for participatory research and monitoring, improved
governance and agency and collaborative actions around village level water resource management, rainfed
cropping systems, grazing management, village level savingsand loan associations and farmer centers for
local input provision and marketing.
Research and development assistance’s key role will beto create and facilitate innovation platforms for
local action in an environment of increasingly fractured social structures, immense economic and survival
pressures, and where direct government support to rural dwellers has decreased dramatically over the last
decade. Use ofthesmallholder farmer level decision support system will ensure a locally motivated and
owned agenda for action, with potential for transformative adaptation that includes local stakeholders and
service providers in the Communities of Practice (CoPs).
MILESTONE 5: REVIEW AND NETWORKING (1): PROGRESS REPORT.
| 3
Contents
1 Executive Summary .....................................................................................................4
1.1 Progress for the reporting period ................................................................................4
2 Project Objectives ......................................................................................................4
2.1 Overview of RW Community based CCA Project objectives..................................................4
3 Milestone Description...................................................................................................5
3.1 Definition of milestone and purpose ............................................................................5
4 Communities of practice and stakeholder engagement...........................................................5
4.1 Communities of practice ..........................................................................................5
4.2 Stakeholderrelationships and collaboration ...................................................................6
5 Climate Change learning groups ......................................................................................8
5.1 Progress with Learning and Mentoring ..........................................................................8
6 Progress for main activities ..........................................................................................11
6.1 Learning and implementation ..................................................................................11
6.2 Village Savings and Loan Associations (VSLAs) and enterprise development.............................40
7 Monitoring, evaluation and learning (MEL) plan..................................................................49
7.1 Framework & indicators .........................................................................................49
7.2 Garden monitoring ...............................................................................................50
8 Work Plan for Milestone 6............................................................................................54
8.1 Work plan for April - September 2021.........................................................................55
MILESTONE 5: REVIEW AND NETWORKING (1): PROGRESS REPORT.
| 4
1Executive Summary
1.1Progress for the reporting period
Learning group members across nine ofthe thirteen villages have been engaged between November 2020
and March 2021 in a number of leaning and mentoring activities related to climate resilient agriculture (CRA)
including: Conservation Agriculture, small livestock production and management, greywater management
and tower gardens, seed saving, and soil fertility and soil and water conservation. Learning group activities
have included the finalisation of tunnel construction, working with local teams as support,follow-up for
enterprise development activitiesplanned and undertaken, themonthly VSLA meetings for the 9 associations,
planting of new mangovarieties formarketing purposesand continuation with watercommittees and water
system maintenance.
The organic marketing process has been supported. Continuation with learning sessions to bring participants
from 3 villages (Sedawa, Mametja and Turkey) to readiness for PGS organic certification.Hoedspruit PGS
meetings and process for certification PGA SA negotiations have been held, as has a webinar with PGS-SA to
explore group-based certification options.
In total155 participants have been involved in learning and mentoring support processes during this period.
With regards networking and stakeholder engagement,MDF has participated in theAgroecology network,
both nationallyand in Limpopo and provided input into theAVACLIM research process, networking and
negotiations with PGS-SA, Hpedspruit PGS quarterly meeting joint proposal development with the Nova
institute for a Nexus project with WRC, and have continued our collaboration with AWARD and K2C
PARTICIPANTS THIS PERIOD
MAHLATHINI: Erna Kruger,Betty Maimela, Thembhani Mabunda (Intern), Nqe Dlamini, MazwiDlamini
CHEMONICS: Sitha Mvumvu, Mayford Manika, Lindela Mketeni and Steve Collins.
2Project Objectives
2.1Overview of RW Community based CCAProject
objectives
GOAL: Increased adaptive capacity and resilience to the impacts of climate change for poor, rural
households involved in agriculture.
This goal is aimed specifically at Objectives 3 and 4 as set out in the 2019 Resilient Waters Program APS:
Objective 3: Strengthened ability of communities and key institutions to adapt to change,
particularly the impacts of climate change; and
Objective 4: Conserved biodiversity and ecosystem services.
OBJECTIVES:
MILESTONE 5: REVIEW AND NETWORKING (1): PROGRESS REPORT.
| 5
Reduced vulnerability to climate change by supporting and strengthening collective action,
informed adaptation strategies and practices and tenable institutional arrangements at a local
level, including all relevant service providers and sectors.
Increased sustainability and efficiency of CSA systems in the study areas giving specific attention
to the value chain, using an IS approach
Adaptation and scaling out of sustainable CSA systems in selected areas using livelihoods and
environmental criteria and
Building and strengthening of different innovation platforms and networks for financing,
awareness and implementation of community level Climate Change Adaptation (CCA)."
3Milestone Description
3.1Definition of milestone and purpose
Milestone descriptions have beendeveloped for the RW CB-CCA project for the period starting January 2020
and ending November 2021.The table below summarises the activities against the present milestone
description and budget.
Table 1: Mahlathini Development Foundation Milestone 5: 30 November 2020-7 April 2021
Payment
No.
Milestone
Title
Milestone Verification
Target Due
Date
5
Visioning and
Decision
Support (I)
Progress report
The grantee will submit to Chemonics a ReviewandNetworking
report detailing the following:
i.Type ofclimate change community of practice formed.
ii. Progressin implementation and impact effected.
iii. Synergiesandrelationships formed with institutions.
iv. Collaboration between local andregional players
The grantee will also submit a progressreport outlining progress
in all main activitiesundertaken from30 November2020- 30
March 2(021 (including visioningand decisionssupport, action
plants, learning and mentoring and monitoring)
Annexes:
i. Attendanceregistersfrom community of practice meetings.
ii. Photographs fromcommunity of practice meetings
7 April
2021
4Communities of practice and
stakeholder engagement
4.1Communities of practice
The village-based learning groups are the main Communities of Practice through which participants:
Learn together in a group setting,
Review and plan their activities, experimentation and implementation,
MILESTONE 5: REVIEW AND NETWORKING (1): PROGRESS REPORT.
| 6
Undertake any further joint activities such as village savingsand loan associations, water
committees, PGS groups, marketing groups etc and
Interact with external stakeholders.
These CoPs provide the framework for building social agencyand coherence, whilealso providing
participants the freedom to implement their farming and marketing individually.
The tale below outlines the CoPsset up in this process and the number of participants. The existing learning
groups are those that were formed within the USAID AgriculturalSupport Initiative, which have been brought
into this programme.
For the RW programme the targetover the two-yearimplementation peridot is9-12 CoPs with 370
participants. Presently there are 15 CoPs with 449 participants. Around 15% of these participants are youth
between the ages of 18-30 years. 70% of the participants are women.
Table 1: CoPs and participant numbers for the RW programme: March 2021
CoPs: Village based learning
groups
Existing
New
TOTAL
Female
Male
Female
Male
Female
Male
Sedawa, incl Bosholosi
30
11
24
10
54
21
Mametja
8
2
2
1
10
3
Finale (inactive)
9
5
3
9
8
Willows
20
9
2
3
22
12
Turkey 1,2 ,4 (Nsthabaleng)
58
26
33
21
91
47
Botshabelo (Inactive)
9
4
9
4
Lepelle (inactive)
13
7
13
7
Worcester
27
10
27
10
Madeira
17
9
17
9
Santeng
30
7
30
7
Lorraine (inactive)
4
3
4
3
Mulalani
26
6
26
6
147
64
165
63
312
137
TOTAL
211
228
449
Subtract inactive groups
408
4.2Stakeholder relationships and collaboration
Given the COVID-19 lockdown and social distancing regulations that have now been in effect for a year and
are likely to continue for the duration of this programme, some of the larger farmer and stakeholder level
networking and sharing events planned, have not come to fruition.
Instead, the work has continued through working mostly at village level with smaller, repeating workshops
and processes across the villages as required. Small cross visits have been undertaken for a few participants
from one learning group visiting other villages in the programme. Thishas meant that learning and
implementation has continued as planned.
Maintaining and expanding relationships with Government level stakeholders such as the Department of
Agriculture, the Maruleng Local Municipality, the Water Service Authorities, and the DMs have been a real
challenge.These stakeholders were unavailable for an extended period and upon return to their offices
MILESTONE 5: REVIEW AND NETWORKING (1): PROGRESS REPORT.
| 7
have implemented their own versions of austerity budgets and processes, focusing in the IDP for 2020-21 on
service provision (water, sanitation, electricity, roads, refuse removal) and the EPWP. There are no projects
or processes focused on smallholder farmers or agricultural development.
MDF has built ongoing relationships with local and regional stakeholders to strengthen programme
implementation and voice of rural dwellers and smallholders. The list below provides a summary.
Association for Water and Rural Development (AWARD):Collaboration with AWARD on joint
activities in implementation and networking including for example; food parcel funding and
distribution during COVID lockdown levels 4 and 5,PGS (Participatory guarantee System for Organic
certification) Hoedspruit, PGS learning process for smallholders and negotiation with SAOSO and
PGS-SA, youthbased learning and initiatives, groundwater participatoryresearch process,
involvement in the Agroecology Network Limpopo chapter and a joint proposal forTransforming
education for Sustainable Futures. In addition, we have jointly developed the “tala Table” local
marketing initiative.
Kruger to Canyon Biosphere (K2C): Negotiation for collaboration in their marketing initiatives and
the PGS pollinator programme. Weeklyand monthly organic vegetable sales on their internet
platform (From the region forthe region) as well a at the Hoedspruit farmers’ market and presently
the Kamogelo market.
The Hoedspruit Hub: Collaboration as a social development partnerin the Hoedspruit PGS, joint
training initiatives in organic mango production and marketing
Hlokomela, Seeds of light andZingela ulwazi: Networking and informationsharing. Initial ideas for
collaboration in permaculture training, marketing of organic herbs and water provision were put on
hold due to COVID-19 as all organisations experienced funding and implementation cuts.
The Nova Institute:Joint funding proposals forwater, sanitation and farming nexus projects as well
as commercialisation of organic mango production for drying through the M-Pak facility.
The World Wildlife Fund (WWF):negotiation for potential marketing contracts as well as
discussions around WWF support for community level water provision processes. These are ongoing.
AgroecologyNetwork:MDF is a member of the national network and in the learning and
implementation working group and is also a founding member of the Limpopo chapter of the network.
Recently inputhas been provided intoa policy and advocacyresearch process into Agroecology
coordinated through the UWC.
Adaptation Network: MDF is a member of thisnetwork and most recently provideda presentation
on a webinar around Nature based solutions to development.
Advocacy processes:MDFhas participated in advocacy and policy submissions through theC-19
Coalition, the SA Food Sovereignty Campaign and the Climate Action campaign.
DARD: Here interactions have included working with the State Vet in the area toassist livestock
associations with vaccinations, certificates for sale etc,assisting individual who have been provided
with input support tokens through the COVID 19 departmental response and engaging around seed
provision and distribution by the Department.
In summary, MDF maintains a wide range of local, regional and national stakeholderrelationships and
collaborations to strengthen and farther the agendas for community level climate change adaptation
implementation, water provision, agroecology and food sovereignty.
MILESTONE 5: REVIEW AND NETWORKING (1): PROGRESS REPORT.
| 8
5Climate Change learning groups
Below is a small map indicating villages where the CCAlearning groups are active.
Figure 1: Map of villages where the CCA learning groups are presently active; March 2021
5.1Progress with Learning and Mentoring
Overall, MDF has engaged 449 participants across 13 villages. Of these participants 70% are women and 30%
are men. Youth involvement is still reasonably small at around 15%.
The process followed by MDF is toworkat individual homesteads and with small verylocalised groups of
participants to continue the learning and implementation in CRA. Attendance at learning and mentoring
workshops and planning sessions has thus been muchlowerand the sessions are repeated for a larger number
of small gatherings.
During this period learning and mentoring focused on Conservation Agriculture, seed saving, drip irrigation
livestock health, soil fertility, tower gardens, value adding and food processing.
In total, 135participants across 11villages have received learning and mentoring support between November
2020 and March 2021. A total of 20 learning and mentoring sessions have been conducted.
Table 2:Summary of CCA learning group progress and planned activities: November 2020-March 2021
Learning group
(no of active
participants in
the reporting
period)
CCA
planning
Practices to focus on,
from CCA and review
workshop sessions
Progress with activities (April
2021)
Planned activities
(April June 2021)
MILESTONE 5: REVIEW AND NETWORKING (1): PROGRESS REPORT.
| 9
Turkey 1 (24),
Turkey 2(18)
and
Turkey 4 (34)
(76
participants)
Done
Seedling production,
processing (chilli,
Marula, beetroot and
achar), tower gardens,
organic mango
production and mango
grafting, eco-circles,
seed saving, composting,
markets, nurseries
-Natural soil fertility and liquid
manure (24)
-Mandala bed and permaculture
training (36)
-Tunnel construction (15,14)
- VSLAsmonthly meetings and
mentoring for Turkey 1(19)and
Turkey 2 (14)
- Tower garden training, Turkey4
(18)
-Trenchbeds training workshop
turkey 4 (34)
- trench beds recap and eco-
circle training Turkey 1,2 (24,18)
- Organic marketing - PGS
training sessions 2 (12), 3(16)
- Enterprise development
training (17)
- Water committee meetings and
monitoring of water scheme
implementation (18)
-CA training; experimentation
and follow-up (18)
- Seed saving (16)
- PGS 4, Follow up on visioning,
tala table, household maps
fruit trees: (10)
- Value adding and food
processing (5)
- Organic marketing
(PGS workshops 5-6),
PGS registration intro
(Karabo)
- Seasonalreview and
planning meeting and
crop calendars
- Soil and water
conservation
- Natural pest and
disease control
-Monthly VSLA
meetings
Sedawa (34),
Bosholozi (29)
and Mametja
(63
participants)
Done
Liquid manure, natural
pest and disease control
workshop, shallow
trenches, eco-circles,
mandala garden,
irrigationmanagement,
soil conservation (stone
lines, check dams,
terraces),tower
gardens, livestock
integration, seed saving
review and storage,
organic mango training,
compost, value adding to
crops, example basil
pesto, tomato jam
- Mandala bed and permaculture
training (28)
-VSLAmonthly meetingsand
mentoring for3 groups in Sedawa
(13,19,15)
- Water committee meetingsx3
and monitoring of water scheme
implementation (19)
- Organic marketing PGS
training sessions 2 (16), 3 (17)
- Enterprise development
training (11)
- Water committee meetings (x 3)
and monitoring of water scheme
implementation (21)
-CA training; experimentation
and follow-up (21, 29)
- Seed saving (34)
- Drip irrigation (29)
- PGS 4, Follow up on visioning,
tala table, household maps
fruit trees: (10)
- Value adding and food
processing (5)
-Monthly VSLA
meetings
- Organic marketing
(PGS workshops 4-6)
- Natural pest control,
liquid manures
-Mango grafting
practical
- Any new innovation
that MDF might know
of that they haven’t
tried.
- Nursery
- Seasonalreview and
planningincluding
Crop calendar
-Bosholozi:Soil
fertility, bed design,
mixed cropping,
-Soil and water
conservation
Willows (18
Participants)
Done
Bed design, seed saving,
seedling propagation,
Conservation
agriculture, drip kits,
trench beds, mulching,
furrows and ridges,
banana circles,
rainwater harvesting,
organic mango
production, tower
gardens, liquid manure,
- VSLA monthly meetings and
mentoring for Willows(17)
-Tunnel construction workshop
and follow-up (10)
- Organic marketing; planning
and implementation
-Enterprise Development training
- Livestock health withstate Vet
(12)
- Poultry production: follow up
and support (4)
-Seed saving (
- MonthlyVSLA
meetings
- Organic marketing
- Eco-circlesand
mixed cropping, crop
calendars
- Mandala bed and
permaculture training
-Soil and water
conservation
-Drip irrigation
MILESTONE 5: REVIEW AND NETWORKING (1): PROGRESS REPORT.
| 10
natural pestand disease
control.
-Tower gardens (18)
-Value adding and food
processing (5)
-Seasonal review and
Natural pest and
disease control
Finale(9
Participants)
INACTIVE
Done
Poultry production, field
cropping practices,
marketing,
- Organic marketing; planning
and implementation
- Organic marketing
Santeng (25
Participants)
Done
Drip irrigation, diversion
ditches, greywater
management, rainwater
harvesting, ridgesand
furrows, stone bunds,
keyholeends, banana
basins, crop rotation,
mixed cropping,
mulching, conservation
agriculture, targeted
fertilizer and lime
application, liquid
manure, trenchbeds,
legumes, compost, eco-
circles
-Tunnel construction training and
follow-up(18)
- VSLA monthly meetings and
mentoring for Santeng (13)
- Enterprise development
training (25)
-CA training; experimentation
and follow-up (16)
- Seed saving (22)
-Tower gardens (16)
Value adding and food
processing (5+)
- MonthlyVSLA
meetings
- Organic marketing
- Soil and water
conservation
-Drip irrigation
- Natural P&D control
and mixed cropping
-Seasonal review and
crop calendars.
Worcester (18
Participants)
Done
Seedling production, drip
irrigation, greywater
management, tower
gardens, natural pest
and disease control,
growing herbs, seed
saving
- CCA introduction, 5 finger
principles (13)
- VSLAsmonthly meetings and
mentoring for Worcester (14)
- Tower garden training (15)
-CA training; experimentation
and follow-up (18)
- Seed saving (17)
- Tunnel construction (7
participants
-Tower gardens (16)
- Value adding and food
processing (5+)
- MonthlyVSLA
meetings
- Value adding
- Soil and water
conservation
- Natural pest and
diseasecontrol and
liquid manures
-Eco-circle, mixed
cropping and crop
rotation
- Drip irrigation
Madeira (14
Participants)
Worked with Lia
before and now
not so keen to
try these things
at home) Larger
fields: We were
a little late
with theCA
would need to
come in early
October
Done
Drip irrigation, mulching,
keyholebeds (grey
water), furrow and
ridges, banana circles,
rainwater harvesting,
tied ridges, targeted
fertilizer and lime
applications, liquid
manure, trench beds,
eco-circles, seed saving
- VSLA introduction training and
monthly meetings and mentoring
for (14)
-Meeting withwater committee
(9)
-Seed saving
- Value adding and food
processing (5+)
- MonthlyVSLA
meetings
-Keyhole beds, eco-
circles, shallow trench
bed
-Furrows and ridges/
shallow trenchesin
fields (contours)
- Mixed cropping, crop
rotation, liquid
manures
-Organic marketing
Mulalani (36
participants)
Done
Tunnels,underground
tanks, and bigger
rainwater harvesting
structures more
generally, drip kits,
growing fodder for
livestock, conservation
agriculture, diversion
ditches, mulching,liquid
manure, tower gardens,
furrows and ridges,
shallow and deep
trenches, natural pest
and disease control, new
winter e.g. crop options,
- CCA introductionworkshop in
September 2020 (22)
-Trenchbed training workshop
September 2020 (25)
-Seed saving
-Trench beds (25)
- Tunnel construction (6)
-CA introductionworkshop (5)
-Tower gardens (22)
-Value adding and food
processing (5+)
- Eco circles, shallow
trenches
-Seasonal review and
planning, including
crop calendar
- Pest and disease
control, mixed
cropping liquid
manure
-Soil and water
conservation
MILESTONE 5: REVIEW AND NETWORKING (1): PROGRESS REPORT.
| 11
seed saving, savings
groups
Total trained
(Nov-April
2021)
190
6Progress for main activities
6.1Learning and implementation
Written by Betty Maimela
A number of learning and mentoring sessions were conducted during this period including:
Tower gardens: Santeng(16), Nulalani (22), Bosholsi (18), Worcester (16), Willows(18)
CA introduction and experimentation: Bosholozi (29), Santeng (16), Sedawa (21), Wrcrester (18)
Livestock production mentoring and support (Layers, broilers, cattle): Willows, Sedawa
Tunnel construction: 17 tunnels in Turkey, Santeng, Willows, Sedawa, Mulalani and Worcester
Drip irrigation: Bosholosi (6), Sedawa (9), Santeng (5)
Tower gardens
Tower gardens are built-up beds; a constructed tube of shade cloth and poles with a central core of gravel
to filterout and bind some of the soaps in greywater. The medium is made of a third each of soil, compost
or manure and wood ash. The wood ash also binds the soaps. They provide a small, intensive, easy to manage
raised bed, that can be placed close to the home, in circumstances where there is a shortage of water and
a safe way to use greywater.
The learning and implementation sessions in tower gardens werecontinued in this period ofimplementation
for several village-based learning groups.
Figure 2: Tower garden demonstration
workshop at Ella Khohlwane’s homestead in
Santeng.
The workshops started at Mulalani with 22
attended participants at Maria Sekgobela’s
homestead. At Bosholosi there were 18
attended participants at Mpho Morema’s
homestead one of the youth in the group
who joined after the passing of hermother,
taking over the garden. At Worcesterthere were 16 attended participants atMmabotse Masete’s homestead,
one of the oldest participants who asked forhelp with regards to implementing the tower garden as she
cannot implement trench beds in hergarden. At Willows, the workshop was done at Josias Lewele’s
homestead with 18 attended participants.
The materials required can belimiting forsome gardeners, and includes 2x3m 80% shade cloth,4x 1,8m
poles, 5kg gravel,a 5-litre bottomless bucket and two wheelbarrows full of wood ash, six wheelbarrows full
of kraal manure (goat, cattle or chicken) and eight wheelbarrows full of topsoil.
MILESTONE 5: REVIEW AND NETWORKING (1): PROGRESS REPORT.
| 12
Figure 3: Below, from left to right; participants are mixing topsoil with cattle kraal manure and wood ash, while others
have knitted the shed netting aroundthe four poles and have placed abottomless 5kg bucket with small rocks as the
central filtering column for the greywater.
Figure 4: Below, participants are adding all the mixed soil to the knitted net shading, while watering every layer and
moving the bottomless bucket every layer till the mixed soil is finished, then open holes on the sides of the tower
garden where they will be planting seedlings.
Figure 5: Below, participants started planting the seedlings after irrigating the whole tower garden. They planted
seedlings like mustard spinach, thyme, lavender and Origanum inthe tower garden and shared the remaining seedlings
amongst eachother, most especially theherbs like rosemary,Origanum, thyme, lavenderand lemon balm. Herbs are
introduced to act asinsect repellents and to attract pest predators. Rosemary and lemon balm can be mixed with other
herbs like lemon grass and fennel to make tea that assisst with maintaining high blood pressure.
MILESTONE 5: REVIEW AND NETWORKING (1): PROGRESS REPORT.
| 13
Comments from participants per village
1.Mulalani
Maria Sekgobela - Thispractice is easyto implement, the onlyproblem wouldbe getting the 80%
net shading as it is stronget and can last for some years and still be re-used when changing the soil
mixture.
Morake Lehlwane She will implement the practice on her own as she has seen that it is easy to
implement and requires less hard work unlike the trench beds where one has to dig, which is hard
work in the dry, hard soil.
Dina Sebashe Thetower garden is an easy way of gardening more especially for them as they have
to buy water orwait for the municipality trucks todeliver water or wait for the boreholes to be
pumped and then the collect water using wheelbarrows,so with these practice, one can use grey
water from the kitchen or water they used to wash their clothes for irrigation.
2.Bosholosi
Frida Thobejane She loved the practice and suggested that one caneven use maize meal sacks,
fill it with the soil mixture and close it and then open holes where she will be planting her spinach
and one marigold to attract insecst that will eat unwanted insects in the garden.
Shai Filinah She will implement the practice in her garden as she failed toimplement trench beds,
because where she stays is rocky and has no soil. The practice is better as it also allows the use of
grey water, she will not struggle in times where there is no water.
Ruth Morei She loved thepractice and will come to observe the results before she could implement
in her garden. She has seen the results of trench beds andwould like to compare these two practices
with each other in terms of crop growth.
3.Willows
All participants want totry the practice in their garden, the only challenge will be the 80% net
shading, they can make their own seedlings, get the poles, but the notthe net shading.
Most participants in Willows have their own borehole waterthat they use for both domestic and
irrigation and only those with no water will use grey water for irrigating in the tower garden.
4.Worcester
Melita Malatji She is one of the volunteers toimplement the practice with the help of the local
facilitator in her garden and will be monitored by one of MDF facilitators, she also explained that
the practice requires less hard work and materials are easily accessible except the shadecloth.
Mmabotse Masete was very happy, she explained that she has been waiting for this day, she is one
of the elderly in the group who are unable to implement the trench beds and she was saddenedto
see how active the group is and as she stays alone the tower garden is perfect for her and she will
be able to irrigate with greywater.
Conservation Agriculture
By Betty Maimela
introduction and experimentation
MILESTONE 5: REVIEW AND NETWORKING (1): PROGRESS REPORT.
| 14
The season started with substantially more rainfallthan in the past five years and participants
enthusiastically returned to dryland field cropping.The rainfall was however not consistent, with longish
periods of extreme heat in between and heavy downpours later in the season caused substantial erosion. In
all the season yielded much lower than expected growth.
Conservation Agriculture (CA) is a practice used for soil and water conservation, improvement of soil fertility
and soil health and improvement of yields. CA is based on three principles that farmers are taught:
1.Minimumsoil disturbance.Farmers are advised to disturb the soil as little as possible onlywhere
they plant seeds, kraal manure and compost on the soil and leavea small basin for water catchment.
They arealsotaught not to plough the soil with tractors or hand hoes. This saves farmer’s money
and assists in reducing soil erosion caused either by wind or rainwater.
2.Soil cover. This can be easily donewith seasonal crop residues.The soil must always remaincovered,
either by residues ora mulch of dry grass orleaves. This principle, when managed properlycan
improve water infiltration, reduce soil erosion, reduce evaporation and conserve soil moisture and
helps to suppress weeds.
3.Diversified cropping. Intercropping with legumes and cucurbits (beans, cowpeas, pumpkins, Dolichos,
ground nuts, jugobeans) and cropping of summer cover crop mixes (sunflower, Sun hemp and millet)
are introduced forfarmers to diversify their cropping. Monocropping is discouraged. With crop
rotation, crops are alsorotated in a field to ensure soil and crop health and an even distribution of
soil nutrients. In the experiments, food crops are mixed with soil enriching, biomass building crops.
The process of intercropping yields many benefits, for example: addition of nitrogen and other
nutrients into the soil conservation of water, suppression of weeds and pest and disease control.
Bosholosi CA introduction and experimentation
Date: 05 November
Homestead: Lesterina Mogofe
Number of participants: 29
Bosholosi is a new group
which has beenset up as an
extension ofthe Sedawa
learning group. Here Betty
and Christina (LF for
Sedawa) introduced the CA
concepts and
experimentation. A
demonstration plot (2 x
10mx10 plots) was
undertaken with a maize and
bean and maize and pumpkin
intercrop, respectively. In
this organic CA plot, weeds were
removed by hand and bonemeal and limewereadded to kraal
manure for fertility enhancementin the basins and rows planted. A tramline
system using close spacing is used. 50cmx50cm in and between lines for maize and
pumpkins and 25cmx10cm for legumes.
Figure 6: Participantsare using ahandhoeto opensmall basin for both themaizeand
beans, bonemeal, kraal manure. The picture below shows one farmer adding bonemeal
before kraal manure and seeds.
MILESTONE 5: REVIEW AND NETWORKING (1): PROGRESS REPORT.
| 15
Thereafter all participants wereprovided
with seeds to continue their own 10x10CA
plots in their ownhomesteads.
Figure 7: Christinais helping with seed
distribution amongst participants. Seeds
distributed were pumpkin, lab-lab (Dolichos),
summer standard mixture (sunflower, Sun hemp
and sorghum)
Santeng CA demonstration and experimentation
Venue: Santeng
Homestead: Florence Mashego and Ella Khohlwane
Number of participants: 16
In Santeng this is the 2ndseason participants are trying out CA. Their observations from the previous season
included that:
They are against the idea of mulching right after planting the seeds before it rains, with the belief
that due to mulch water does not infiltrate the soil because they rain istoo little to wet both the
mulch and thesoil.Theyfeltthat once it starts raining, they will mulch to avoid evaporation and
to keep the soil moist.
The demonstration plots wereplanted,
starting at Florence Mashego’s homestead
with two 5mx5m plots, one withtramlines of
maize and sugar beans (5m)another with
maize and cowpeas. Another plot was
planted to the summer standard mixtureof
Sun hemp, sunflower and sorghum in rows
that were 30cm apart. At Ella Khohlwane,
because of thelack of space,only oneplot
was done ofmaize tramlines intercropped
with beans and pumpkins, respectively.
Figure 8: Top right: Betty is demonstrating to
participants howto apply bonemeal and Christina
Shai is adding chicken kraal manure before
adding seeds and Below right: Participantsare
planting seeds and insmall basins, making sure
that each basin will collect rainwater, whenit
rains.
After planting at Florence’s field, we moved
to Ella khohlwane’s home stead for the third plot of theexperiment.
Ella’s soil is very rocky and shallow. As she
had already planted a maize and bean
intercrop the experiment focused on
intercrops of maize, pumpkin and cowpeas.
Figure 9: Participants continued with the third
plot at Ella Khohlwane’s household, where
chicken manure and bonemeal were added before
planting the maize and pumpkinseed.
MILESTONE 5: REVIEW AND NETWORKING (1): PROGRESS REPORT.
| 16
Sedawa CA demonstration and experimentation
The Sedawa learning group is one of the oldest groups in the programme and every season, some participants
prepare their land for CA and other do not, due to the extreme heat and low rainfall experienced in recent
years. This season early rains were good.
Christina Thobejane worked with the
group in purchasing both seeds kept form
last season, notably cowpeas, from
Magdelina Malepe and maize and other
seeds such as ground nuts form the
shops. It was agreed all participants
would do three intercropped plots each.
Figure 10: Participants form Sedawa are
working with Christina Thobejane to
intercrop plots of maize, cowpeas and
groundnuts.
Date: 30 November 2020
Venue: Mpelesi Sekgobela’s field cropping
Number of participants: 21
Most of the participants were new members in the group, as others are already familiar with the practices,
although they do not pay much heed to the rotational aspect of the CA plots.
This season, Mpelesi remembered not to
plough thefield and theblanket of weedsand
grass had helped to keep some of themoisture
in the soil. Goat manure and bonemeal were
used to add fertility to the soil.
Figure 11: Sedawa participants working on the
demonstration plot at Mpelesi’s homestead.
Worcester CA
demonstration and experimentation
Date: 02 December 2020
Homestead: Rosina Maanaso
Number participants: 18
Worcester is a new learning group. A learning session was held to introduce all the concepts. In this village
the homestead yards are large, and
participants plant their field crops there. As
this demonstration was a little late, the
participants had already experienced the
first lull in rainfall,as it had rained well in
the first two weeks of November and then
no rain fell for 3-4 weeks. Participants
however opted toplant and hope for the
best. Soils here are sandy, exposed, dry and
hot.
Figure 12: Worcester participants busy with the
CA demonstration plot. The sandy, infertile soil
is apparent.
MILESTONE 5: REVIEW AND NETWORKING (1): PROGRESS REPORT.
| 17
Animal drawn planter demsontrations
SANTENG
Here a team of donkeys was hired for the day to test out the Knapick animal drawn planter. We needed to
ascertain whether donkeys could in fact pull this planter and how wellit works as farmers in this area do
not use oxen for ploughing and the planter isquite heavy and large. Some time needed tobe spent toadjust
the seed bins toensure that the seeds were deposited at the correct spacing and depth. As the field isquite
small, difficulties ensued with turning the team of donkeys aroundwith the planter tocontinue with the
following row.
Farmers were happy about theplanter and
were already making plans totake it tothe
big fieldstotry it out. Specifically, the
two Mogofe brothers from Willows are
wanting to try it out on their fields.
Figure 13: trying out the animal drawn no till
planters with a team of donkeys, in Santeng.
CA experimentation monitoring
As in previous years, CA crop establishment and growth was disappointing. This was a result both of
intermittent heavy rainfall that caused substantial erosion on these sandy infertile soils and then period of
extreme heat, where many of the crops wilted and died.
Building up organic matterand using intensive soil and water conservation techniques are going to be crucial
going forward. The facilitation team was taken a little by surprise by the extent of the erosion,as all
previous years had in fact been drought years.
Santeng CA monitoring
Ella Khohlwane: She explained that after planting, it did not rain for a month, followed by heavy rains that
washed away the beans that had germinated. Due to heat pants were stressed and maize was attacked by
stalk borerand aphidsand cowpeas by aphids. She replanted maize where it did not grow and intercropped
with pumpkin and watermelon. She alsoplanted green beans, which once again were washed away by heavy
rains.
Figure 14: right Ella
Khohlwane’s plot where
cowpeas are growing
reasonably well,beans have
been washed away and
maize is showing patchy
growth and yellowing.
There is evidence of sever
run-off and extremely low
levels of organicmatter in
the soil. Far right:Evidence
of stalk borer and aphids in
maize.
MILESTONE 5: REVIEW AND NETWORKING (1): PROGRESS REPORT.
| 18
Figure 15: Below left and right: Ella’s maize with evidence in the foreground of runoff and her latest planting of green
beans struggling due to runoff heat and infertile soils.
Florence Mashegointercropped maize, ground nuts, cowpeas, watermelon,ground nuts and Mokopu.
Florence had three plots; one where she planted maize with cowpeas, one with maize and sugar beans and
the third with millet, sunflowerand Sun hemp. For this third plot, she used the traditional practice of
furrow and ridges.This plot did very well compared with the standard CA planting practices. It was alsothe
only plot where she added manureand bonemeal. Participants continue to believe, despite quite strong
evidence to the contrary that they have naturally fertile soils and that they don’t needto use organic matter
to plant.
Figure 16:
Florccne’sSCC plot
planted with
manure and
bonemeal using
furrows and ridges
growing very well.
NomsaMafologeleand other participants in the Santeng learning group
opted not toplant their CAplots, given the extreme heat and little to no
rainfall in December.
Maanawe Shaiplanted her plotsafterthe first rain in October. She planted
maize, cowpeas, pumpkin and ground nuts, using seedsshe saved from previous
summer season. She used borehole water to irrigate due to lack of rain and
extreme heat. Maanawe also planted some vegetables (in her trench beds, to
sell around December, like beetroot, spinach, carrots and brinjals. She
managed to make around R730.o00 in December from vegetable sales.
MILESTONE 5: REVIEW AND NETWORKING (1): PROGRESS REPORT.
| 19
She also planted a second CAplot in Decembertoyellow maize, cowpeas and jugobeans with seeds she
received from MDF. She did not use any manure or prepare her field properly in this instance. Soil erosion
was evident, as was very low levels of organic matter. Maanawe also explained that since it started raining
later in the season and
continued to rain
heavily, the
groundnuts re-
germinate in their
pods instead ofdrying
out.
Figure 17: Right above:
Plot of maize, harvested
and cowpea intercrop,
with cowpeas growing
well Right below: Maize
has not done well due to
lack of nutrients,
intermittent rain and
heat Far right:
groundnuts re
germinating in their
pods whilestill in the
ground due to continued
late season rain.
Lethabo Malepe planted both maize and legumes.Most of the
seed didn’t germinate due to extreme heat in the beginning
of the growing season.She has made stone lines to try and
deal with runoff,but shas still had some small gulleys forming
due to heavy late season rain.
Figure 18:Right: Stone lines that Lethabo built to control soil
movement and Far right: a gully that formed due to water
movement.
Turkey CA monitoring
Angelina Malatjifrom Turkey 1 divided her farm into three plots, which she planted usingdifferent planting
system and different times. Two plots that are based in her homestead she planted in the second week of
November, while the third plot she planted in December. Angelina used her own old farming system with
minimum tillage using a hand hoe in the first two plots and used the animal drawn planter with donkeys in
the third plot. In both the first and second plot she managed to add kraal manure, because they are small
and easy to manage as they are also in the homestead.
She had trouble with the soil being too dry initially and later in the season being waterlogged, as indicated
by the yellowing maize that was stunted in patches. This is reasonably typical of turkey as whole.
MILESTONE 5: REVIEW AND NETWORKING (1): PROGRESS REPORT.
| 20
Figure 19: Angelina’s maize showing reasonable growth
interspersed with patches of yellowing, stunted maize in
waterlogged areas of her field
Mmatshego Shaiis anenthusiastic farmer and prefers
to plant legumes such as groundnuts, beans, cowpeas
and jugo beans, as theydo better than maize. She
uses kraal manurewhen planting. This season she
planted the maize in a small patch,which she
mulched with thatchgrass, leading to good
germination and growth. Her legumes, plantedin
blocks have also done reasonably well, despite severe
runoff and erosion being caused by heavyrainfall. She
has already spent considerable effort laying out beds
and run-off channels, but these were unfortunately
“overrun”.She will continue to improve her soil and
conservation system.
Figure 20: Clockwise from Top Left: 1. Patch of maize grown tall and green by using manure and generous mulching of
grass, 2. Beans also mulched growing well, 3. Erosion fromexcessive run-off despite ditches, pathways and beds
designed for run-off control and 4. A block of groundnuts and cowpeas
Isaac Malatjialso planted summer crops inDecember. As he had tall grass in his plot he opted to plough
which has had devastating effects in his
field. Mr Malatji however stubbornly denied
that he saw anything amiss.
Figure 21: Field with strong signs of erosion and
runoff with crops struggling to grow. As the soil
is an unstructured sandy-clay there are also small
patches of waterlogging in the indentations.
MILESTONE 5: REVIEW AND NETWORKING (1): PROGRESS REPORT.
| 21
Elias Mogofe’s crops were also
not in good condition,despite a
stone line he implemented in his
garden aftera soil conservation
workshop. There were signs of
sandy infertile soils, lack of
organic matterand a lot of run-
off.More effort would be
required to improve the condition
of his soil and garden.
Figure 22: Right Above: A stone line,
Right below: Sweet potato in the
foreground and yellow maize behind
and Far Right: Considerable erosion
caused by unchecked run-off in
Elias’s plot.
Sedawa CA monitoring
Sedawa participants havefared somewhat better in their CA implementation, as they have been trying for
a few years now. They believe stronglythat the CAassists in crop growth during droughts and heat and have
started to work on building up organic matter in their soils by adding cattle goatand poultry manure, making
and using compost and planting cover crops and legumes. Aselection of participants alsohave boreholes
and wateris used for
supplementary
irrigation (or they
have access to the
learning group
based borehole for
irrigation).
Figure 23: Meisie’s
maize plots with stone
lines, which are
looking reasonable
despite difficult
weather conditions,
right below: A plot of
maize intercropped
with pumpkin and Raf
right: Her compost
enclosure.
MILESTONE 5: REVIEW AND NETWORKING (1): PROGRESS REPORT.
| 22
Magdelina Malepe’s cropping has also improved year on
year as she started with a very infertile and eroded plot,
but has diligently worked on soil conservation structures
and improving her soil conditions.
Figure 24: Right above: Magdelina has planted her maize and
intercropped that with summer cover crops (sunflower, Sun
hemp and millet and Right below: A view of cowpeas growing
very well in between young fruit trees.
Joyce Seotlo’s CAtrial also looked good this season.
She planted maize,pumpkins and cowpeas in one
intercropped plot (shown below).
Conclusion
Only a few of the farmers have been diligent in implementing thethree CA
principles and in undertaking thesoil and water conservationstructures in their
gardens. These farmers are now reaping the benefits ofthese practices. It would
bea good idea to repeatsome ofthe soil and waterconservation practical
learning sessions, now that farmers are once again remembering the damage
that can be caused by heavyrains (as shown on the right).
In some ways the climate in the area already no longer favours maize production
and participants have beenadvised to try and focus on crops that are more
adapted to this environment. Few howeverwant togive up on cultivating maize.
Seed saving
A set of four seed saving workshops were conducted during the week of 16th-19thof November 2020. Anna
Molala, from Sekhukhune and a lead facilitator for the Ukuvuna programme undertaken in their area is an
avid seed saver and has set up a seed saving structure in herhomestead. She agreed torun these workshops
and work with participants in theLower Olifants’ tofocus onseed savingand setting upseed saving networks
at a village level.
Introduction
Village
Venue
Date
No of Participants
Santeng and Willows
Nomsa’s Residence
16/11/2020
22
Sedawa and Mametja
Christina’s Residence
17/11/2020
34
Worcester and Mulalani
Community hall
18/11/2020
17
Turkey and Madeira
Mkhawane’s Residence
19/11/2020
16
MILESTONE 5: REVIEW AND NETWORKING (1): PROGRESS REPORT.
| 23
Seed saving is important toenable farmers toadapt to climate change which in turn promotes and adds
value to Climate Resilient Agriculture (CRA). Furthermore, seed saving increase farming production, food
security, profitability, and allows for sustained production.
These workshops were held as input and discussion sessions, guided by a set of questions form Anna. Topics
discussed included:
Seeds kept by participants and practices around
seed saving,
Gardening for seed,
Pollination and seed,
Harvesting and storage
Types of seed to be kept and
Why seedbanks and preparations for starting them.
Some general summary points foreachofthe topics is
provided below.
Participants considered seed saving as very important to their farming, both to keep traditional seed that
cannot be bought in shops and to have a wide variety of crops to be planted close at hand. Seed is a way of
resecting traditional culture and handing it down to futuregenerations. It is a way of farming organically
and ensuring that we have healthyfood to eat.It isalso a source of food for both humans andanimals,
especially chickens. It is alsoa way of ensuring that seed is available, as even if some people lose theirseed
through drought or other problems some people in the area will still have seed to share.
Seeds kept in these communities include: Maize, sorghum, gourds, pumpkin, watermelons, beans,
groundnuts, cowpeas, jugo beans, pigeon pea, moringa and vegetables such as traditional greens (cleome
and Amaranthus) spinach, tomatoes, onions, mustard and more recently herbs such as coriander, parsley,
basil, rocket, fennel and rosemary.
Gardening for seedmeans that gardening should be done to the best of one’s ability ensuring healthy,
nutrient rich soil, for healthy cropsand healthy seed.Birds can be controlled by planting crops such as
sunflowers to lure them there to feed instead of on other crops. Anna warned against the use of fertilizers
and poisons as those would reducefertility and lead to weaker seedin thelonger term. Discussions were
held abouthow todeal with watershortages and common pests in the gardenssuch as ants,aphids and
beetles. Anna warned against the use of pesticides such as blue death, as this also kills thebeneficial species.
Anna encouraged participants to start keeping seed of cropsthat they havenot doneto date including
carrots, spinach, tomatoes and brinjals.
MILESTONE 5: REVIEW AND NETWORKING (1): PROGRESS REPORT.
| 24
Figure 25: Above Left and Right: Seed saving workshops in Worcester and Santeng respectively. The table displays seed
for sharing brought by Anna, Erna and community members. Community members were particularly interested in the
butter beans, scarlet runner beans, mustard spinach, traditional melon, black beans, yellow podded wax beans, tree
tomatoes, granadillas, and tobacco seeds.
Pollinationwas discussed;talking tothe structure of flowers, how seeds are formed, examples of crops
with male and female partis in the same flowere.g., tomatoes and beans, in separate flowers but the same
plant, e.g., cucumbers and pumpkins and on separate plants e.g., paw-paws. Pollinators were introduced
as being primarily wind and different kinds of insects, talking to the importance of promoting the presence
of bees specifically in gardens by having flowers with ample nectar available for them and not spraying
pesticides that would kill them. In this regard people mentioned that they have seen that pumpkins would
flowerbut not form seed and the lack of insects for pollination could be one of the reasons. Maize for
example is wind pollinated, meaning that different varieties of maize cancross with each other over very
large distances (up to 1km).
The concept of cross-pollination was introduced, talking to the fact the crops from the same family cross
with each other e.g., different types of peppers and chillies, different types of pumpkins, beetroot and
spinach, different brassicas suchascabbage andkale etc. Some examples of how to deal with this were
provided: Planting different varieties of thesame cropat different times sothat they did not flower at
together and caging plants that are flowering to stop insects from pollinating the different varieties. Hand
pollination is also possible and, in some cases, not at all complicated, such as for pumpkins.
Harvesting seed: Here it was discussed that one needs to keep the plants for seed, sometimes for a longer
period, as for the bi-annualcrops such as cabbages and onions. Evencarrots and spinach can take some time
to seed. One needs tokeep a minimum of6-12 plants, to collect seed form and these plants need to be
healthy throughout their growthcycle. Do not collect seed from diseased plants or from plants that have
bolted. Bolting is when plants go to seed before going through a strong vegetative growth phase. This seed
will have been selected for bolting and the follow-on crop will also bolt.
Storage of seed in a cool dark and dry environment is crucial. If seeds are kept at room temperature, they
will generally not last longer than 2 years. It is possible to keep them in the freezer if they canbe kept dry.
Such seed lasts a lot longer. Plastic bags and containers should be avoided, but paper and glass are fine.
Glass jars with lids that seal are the best as air tight containers preserve seed and do not allowstorage pests
to gain access to the seed. Wood ash and dried ground aloe leaves are good for ensuring that stored seed
do not getpests such as weevils. Anna warned against the use of paraffin for storage, which is common as
it is poisonous and kills the seed over time. Seeds like tomatoes and cucumbers that have a little layer of
gel around them should be soaked in boiled and cooled water for 2-3 days toferment off this layer prior to
drying them. Otherwise, germination is inhibited.
Seedbanksarevery important. A special house for theseed is the best idea and it can be kept cool by
having reedsorgrass on the roof, or even maize stalks. When it rains the runoff from the roofcan be
collected as a kind of liquidmanure. Allbottles should be labelled with the seed name and date of harvesting.
Most participants felt thatthey wanted to have individual seed banks and to share and sell seeds in their
MILESTONE 5: REVIEW AND NETWORKING (1): PROGRESS REPORT.
| 25
learning groups and other community events. Theyfelt that doing it together would require too much
management and potentially lead to conflict in the group. Only the Worcester learning group decided toset
up a group-based seedbank.
It was agreed that seed fares would be an excellent way to continue with the seed saving and sharing seed
between participants and in the communities.
Figure 26: Above Left: Erna discussing pollinations during the Sedawa seed saving workshop and Right: Annawith the
seeds laid out for sharing with the group.
Conclusion
In summary, participants greatly appreciated this
input on seed savingand were very pleased tosee a
fellow farmer in the role of facilitator. This gave them
hope to be able tofollow in Anna’sfootsteps. The
main highlights are as follows:
1.Some participants had already started with
seed saving and making an income through
selling their seeds around the villages.
2.Participants were using their own traditional
way of preserving seeds which then shows
commitment to seed saving.
3.Participants were removing themale part (flower) of the maize not being aware that they were
disturbing the pollination process.
4.All participants showed keen interest in constructing a seed bank; a community or individual seed
bank.
5.Some participants had no clue about seed saving and the workshops made a huge difference.
6.Participants inWorcester village made a request tovisit Anna Molala’s in ordertophysically see
Anna’s seed bank and her garden.
Livestock production mentoring and support
Poultry: Layers and broilers
This was undertaken for individuals in the start-up phases of theirnew poultry enterprises as well as for
those already engaged in poultry production.
MILESTONE 5: REVIEW AND NETWORKING (1): PROGRESS REPORT.
| 26
1Poultry follow-up
Magdalene Malepefrom Sedawa, has used her savingsand small loans from her membership in a savings
group to set up a poultry house , buy layers cages,birds and feed and start a small egg business. She was
inspired through a cross visit to the Phedisang Centre in Turkey, whichis a day care centre, where ladies
also run an egg layer unit. The demand fortheir eggs is much higher than their production capacity and they
doubled the number of hens in their unit.
The field team assisted Magdalena in setting up the layers unit, linking the drinkers to a water supply system
and trouble-shooting issues with fittings and waternipples. Betty Maimela further assisted by accompanying
Magdalena to Tzaneen to purchase the feed and hens.
Figure 27: Above Left and right:views of the poultry house constructed by Magdalena and the layer unit for 96 hens
set up inside the structure/
Magdalene also keeps traditional chickens in a backroom by her house. She noticed that her hens were not
brooding as they normally should,and she had lost eggs in the past because of this. She was keeping her
chickens enclosed in that house and feeds them yellow maize crush daily. She was not aware that brooding
chickens need a good, varied diet to maintain their body weight and health. She was advised to let them
out for a few hours every day to scavengeand improved their diets, by eating bugs and green plants aswell.
After the first day, her hens returned tobrooding. Mme Magdalene was also advised to make use of the
chicken tractor that was demonstrated about a year ago to have control of the 3 hens outside the room she
keeps them in.
Asnath Letebelefrom Willowsis a new poultry farmer who bought 700 egg layers which are overcrowded
in the two poultryhouses that she built. The hens move freely in the house, with no cages. Due to the
overcrowding and unhygienic conditions, the
birds were susceptibleto Coccidiosis which
leads to bloody discharges when laying eggs and
in their faeces and eventually to death. It is also
very contagious in unhygienic conditions. In
addition, Ansath had opted for a different kind
of feed, as it was cheaper, but this disrupted
the laying cycle of the hens.
The other diseases that can be caused by faecal
contamination of environment, feed and water
is Avian encephalomyelitis a virus infection on
laying birds. This virus can survive for 4 weeks
or more and has notreatment besides a
vaccination.
Figure 28: The lifecycle of Coccidiosis in poultryboth
in the and the birds as host.
Asnath was losing 2-4 birds in a day and was
advised to institute a much more rigorous cycle
of cleaning the drinking water,adding more
MILESTONE 5: REVIEW AND NETWORKING (1): PROGRESS REPORT.
| 27
drinkers and poultry houses, of supplying feed in containers off the ground rather than on the ground and
opening the houses for ventilation and cooling during the day.
Figure 29: Egg production inthe overcrowded unhygienic poultry houses dropped from 7x 60cratesa day to 2x 60
crates a day. Egg shells were also weak, with cracks and blood alloverthe eggs. Improved daily management is
required toprovide healthier and cleaner conditions for thehens and certified layers mash needs to be used as feed.
Livestock
To date, support with livestock has revolved around integration through production oflivestock fodder in
field cropping. This has not worked well due to continued droughtand lack of water. Even those farmers
with boreholes have been reluctant to use the water for irrigation, having noticed that their boreholes are
providing muchless waterand becoming salty. Farmers were also experiencing problems with livestock
health and parasites.
In Willows, as in most villages, the livestock farmers belong to an association and use a communal dip tank
fordipping cattle, goats and sheep. The statevet was called in to assistin vaccination and dosing of livestock
in Willows. Dipping is done on a weekly basis,every Tuesday, with assistance from the Departmentof
Agriculture officials from Sekororo. Medication and fodder supply support is providedthrough the
Department on an ad hoc basis. Only one farmer
in this group of around 20 farmers received this
support.
Figure 30: Cattle in the crush pen at the Willowsdip
tank
With assistance from CSA (Conservation South
Africa who as involved in a livestock support
programme in the area), MDF approached the
state vet, Dr. Christiaan Steinmann for support.
In the first meeting hechecked the diseased cattle and advised farmersto buy Tramisol to deal with the
parasites causing the diseases. He also advised farmers that during summer and in the rainy season the
presence of intestinal worms is high asthe eggs cling to the grassand also to watch out for ingestion of
MILESTONE 5: REVIEW AND NETWORKING (1): PROGRESS REPORT.
| 28
poisonous weeds. He discussed the various symptoms with the farmers. He returned a second time to dose
cattle against roundworm and liver fluke worms.
Dr. Steinmann brought needles and farmers bought Tramisol and came with the IVOMEC medication that
they were given by the Local Department of Agriculturefor treating and controlling internal and external
parasites. He assisted farmers with how to do theinjections and dosing of the cattle. 55 Cattle were treated
on the day.
Figure 31: Left to Right:
Christiaanis getting things
ready to treat the cattle and
calves, Cattle in the crush
pen ready for treatment and
dosing of a calf.
Farmers were extrmeley
grateful for this support
and further dates have
been set ofr future
assitance from Dr
Steinmann
Drip Irrigation
A learning process for setting up and installing the drip irrigation kits in thetrench beds and tunnels has
been designed. Each farmerwanting assistance brings along 2-3 other farmers who also want to learn the
process and a practical session is then conducted for them. Thus far these mini workshops have been
conducted in: Bosholosi (19th
Jan 2021)at Mpho Morei’s
homestead and in Santeng
(18thMarch) at Nomsa
Mafologela’s homestead.
Figure 32: From Left to Right: A
participant making the small
dripper holes with strings in the
dripper line, connection of the
bucket to the main feeder lien
and two dripper lines and
installation of the drip kit for a
trench bed in a tunnel.
In theMarch workshop allthe Local facilitators worked together,with the intention that they would continue
to support individual participants in their villages with tunnels to construct the bucket drip irrigation systems
in their gardens and tunnels. They are to keep attendance registers and take photographs in each homestead
support.
Christinah Thobejane, the Local facilitator for Sedawa started the process of assisting individuals in January
2021 and has worked with 9 participants to date.
MILESTONE 5: REVIEW AND NETWORKING(1): PROGRESS REPORT.
| 29
Figure 33: Pictures of
Christina the LF at
Sedawa working with
participants,
constructingbucket drip
kits on for their trench
beds inside their tunnels.
Tunnel construction
The process of allocating tunnels to participants whohave put in their “sweat equity” in the form of digging
and packing trench beds and starting to plant inthem, was continued.The local tunnel contraction team
which was set up and started their activities in Santeng, nowmoved around Turkey, Sedawa, Mulalani,
Worcester and Willows to assist household participants to construct their tunnels.
This 10-member team, consisting of 2 participants from each of five villages, has now assisted to complete
construction of 37tunnels supplied for the 2020-21season. They are nowvery efficient in assisting with the
sewing, bending of the pipes with the jig, and construction itself. They work with asmall team oflocal
participants in each case.The only challenge inthisprocess was the need to transport the tunnel
construction team to the venue for construction in each case.
MILESTONE 5: REVIEW AND NETWORKING (1): PROGRESS REPORT.
| 30
Figure 34: Clockwise
from Top Left: Sewing
the netting onto the
outside arches, bending
the arches with the metal
jig and putting up arches
before pulling the
netting over it and
securing the netting onto
the farmer and into the
soil.
Below are pictures of a selection of the tunnels that have been constructed.
PGS learning and support
The learning process for the 30 participants from Sedawa and turkey in the organic participatory guarantee
system (PGS) is an ongoing collaboration both with AWARD and the Hoedspruit PGS.Time has been spent
developing a concept note for a group-based guarantee system and presenting these to first the Hoedspruit
PGS and then PGS-SA. It became clear that thepresent model ofthe PGS system allows only for small groups
of individuals, so that a PGS only has around 9 members. Each of these members has to be available for all
the peer review monitoring on all thefarms. Hoedspruit PGS could thus notaccommodate the30 odd
smallholder farmers, as originally anticipated. In addition, Hoedspruit PGS insisted that each farmer needs
to have their own soil samples and water qualitysamples done annually,rather than sampling among the
participants to make the process less unwieldy and cheaper.
MILESTONE 5: REVIEW AND NETWORKING (1): PROGRESS REPORT.
| 31
PGS-SA is only now in the process of negotiating with various stakeholders, including MDF to design
customised solutions for group-based certification.
MDF has also negotiated with K2C to include the “Mametja-Sekororo” PGS group in the pollinator programme
being run by SAOSO.For thisprocess, a young local facilitatoris trained and supported toset up aPGS,
inclusive of ensuring all documentation is correctly submitted. Karabo from K2C has now undertaken to set
up two PGS groups, one in Phirieng for K2C and one in Sekororo for MDF.
Explorations have also been done regarding options for soil sample and water quality sample analysis. Afew
soil samples were analysed for theHoedspruit PGS at a laboratory at UCT for soil nutrient andorganic carbon.
As this could not be repeated for other participants and PGS groups, the use of the CEDARA soil analytics
laboratories in KZN has been undertaken. This is a Department of Agriculture research laboratory and soil
sample analysis costs around R200/sample. It is the only provincethat provides this service, and they are
no longer too strict regarding samples originating within KZN.
Soil sampling
Ten soil sampleswere taken from 2 villages: taking 5 samples from Sedawa andTurkey respectively, for
analysis at the CEDARA Soil Analytics laboratory.The samples were subjected to a nutrient analysis for
vegetable and herb production as well as analysis for organic carbon. The idea was to see if samples form
a range of participants are taken, whether a generic recommendation and analysis could be used for the
group, instead of having to undertake sampling for each participant.
Soils samples were taken from the following farmers:
Name and surname
Village
Magdalene Malepe, Esina Malepe, Christina Thobejane, Daphney Maphuru and Mpelesi
Sekgobela
Sedawa
Nkuwane Shai, Norah Tshetlha, Sarah Mohlala, Sarah Madire and Makgalangake Mogale
Turkey
The results for the soil samples however do indicate that specific recommendations will be required for
each participant as there are considerable variations between participants.
Table 3: Soil Fertility and organic carbon analysis for10 PGS participants.
Name and
Surname
Area
Crop to
be grown
pH
Acid sat
(%)
N
Required
(kg/ha)
P
required
K
required
Lime req
t/ha
ZINC
Org. C %
N %
Clay %
Comment
Christina
Thobejane
Sedawa
Beet
7,11
1
150
50
0
0
No
<0,5
<0,05
17
Low OM, high
P requirement
spinach
100
105
20
0
No
Swt pot
100
20
0
0
No
Magdalene
Malepe
Sedawa
Beet
6,05
1
150
160
60
0
No
1
0,07
23
Medium OM,
High P and K
requirement
spinach
100
210
190
0
No
Swt pot
100
60
60
0
No
Esina
Malepe
Sedawa
Beet
6,45
2
150
125
0
0
No
0,8
<0,05
10
Low OM, high
P requirement
spinach
100
165
20
0
No
Swt pot
100
85
0
0
No
Daphney
Maphuru
Sedawa
Beet
7,45
1
150
30
0
0
No
<0,5
<0,05
9
Low OM, high
P requirement
MILESTONE 5: REVIEW AND NETWORKING (1): PROGRESS REPORT.
| 32
spinach
100
75
0
0
No
Swt pot
100
20
0
0
No
Mpelesi
Sekgobela
Sedawa
Beet
7,4
1
150
0
0
0
No
1,9
0,1
19
High OM,good
nutrient
content
spinach
100
0
0
0
No
Swt pot
100
0
0
0
No
Nkuwane
Shai
Turkey
Beet
7,09
1
150
20
0
0
No
0,5
<0,05
7
Low OM, high
P requirement
spinach
100
40
0
0
No
Swt pot
100
20
0
0
No
Norah
Tshetlha
Turkey
Beet
6,9
1
150
0
0
0
No
0,8
<0,05
19
High OM,good
nutrient
content
spinach
100
0
0
0
No
Swt pot
100
0
0
0
No
Sarah
Mohlala
Turkey
Beet
7,45
1
150
0
0
0
No
0,6
<0,05
9
High OM,good
nutrient
content
spinach
100
0
0
0
No
Swt pot
100
0
0
0
No
Sarah
Madire
Turkey
Beet
7,25
1
150
20
0
0
No
1,3
<0,05
10
Medium OM,
medium P
requirement
spinach
100
40
0
0
No
Swt pot
100
20
0
0
No
pH for all participants isreasonably high and no liming is required. The pHs between 6,05 and 7,45 also
indicate that there are unlikely to be micronutrient deficits or accumulation related to acidity and alkalinity.
For the soil sample analysis, the Nitrogen (N) requirement inKg/ha is estimated according to crop
requirements and notwhat is in the soil. Neverthelessthe %Nin these soils is extremely lowfor all
participants, except Mpelesi Sekgobela. Norah Tshethla andSarah Mohlala. N can be improved in the soils
by planting legumes, planting and incorporating cover crops(green manures)and using urine in liquid
manures/ teas.
The availability of Organic carbon in the soils follow a similar trend to the %N, where only threeparticipants
have medium to high levels of %Organic C and the other7 participants have extremely low levels. % OC can
be improved by incorporation of organic matter in the soil, mulching and crop diversification.
High requirements for Potassium (K), indicate that those participants will needtoprovide a high level of
kraal manureand are probably householdswhere manure is not readily available: MagdelinaMalepe and
to a lesser extent/Christina Thobejane.
All participants also need high levels of phosphate (P). This is a little tricky to do organically. The easiest
options are to incorporate bonemeal into the soil and tomake compost and trench beds whichinclude some
bone, hair and skin.
PGS workshop 4
Written by Thembhani Mabunda
The 4th workshop in a series of 6 was co-facilitated between MDF and AWARD.
On the 03rdand 04thof March 2020, session four (4)of PGS training workshop was done for the 30 participants
in three villages in the Lower Olifants basin. The 30 participants are thesame participants that were
MILESTONE 5: REVIEW AND NETWORKING (1): PROGRESS REPORT.
| 33
involvedin PGS training since from session 1 PGS training workshop. The 30 participants who are
participating in PGS training are from three villages namely; Sedawa, Mametja and turkey village. Session 4
PGS training were conducted using and following the programme attached bellow. Covid-19 protocols were
observed in all meeting in respective villages and all protocols were observed.
Village
Participants Present
Date & Venue
Sedawa & Mametja
18 participants
03rdof March 2021. Christina’s Residence.
Turkey
09 participants
04thof March 2021. Lydia’s Residence.
2Review and Follow up
MILESTONE 5: REVIEW AND NETWORKING (1): PROGRESS REPORT.
| 34
A review and follow up ofthe PGS process with farmers were done with all participants, including the use
of their Tala Tables.
Participants from Mametja village mentioned that since the last PGS training they have been
having meetings and displaying organic vegetables on top of the Tala Table and talking and advising
each other on organic farming.
Participants from Sedawa village have been continuing their monthly meeting using the tala table
and displaying the table and selling vegetables on pension pay out around the village, lastly they
also have been using it to sell vegetables in Hoedspruit markets such as the Kamogelo and Khaya-
Ndlovu markets.
The turkey participants have not been doing muchwith thetala table rather than using itontheir
monthly savings meeting. This is because they had not been producing a lot of vegetables due to
lot of rainfall.
3Vision
Inthe previous PGS training meeting, farmers outlined their visions on what they are expecting to achieve
by being part of a PGS process. The visions of all farmers were then grouped together making up different
vision classes. Eight (8) different vision classes were summarized. As part of the session 4 PGS training,
participants were required to explain how they would achieve each of these vision class. Thefollowing table
is illustrative.
Vision
Classes
Village Names
Process of achieving the vision
1.Organic
farming
Sedawa & Mametja
Using mulching, liquid manure, trench beds, and other
technique of organic farming
Turkey
Using organic compost and manure. Also using liquid manure
2.Working
together
Sedawa & Mametja
Conducting meetings and teaching each other to plant crops.
Turkey
Understanding and respecting each other, sharing ideas and
discussing and solving problems around farming.
3.Access
Market
Sedawa & Mametja
Teaching customers about organic produced. Following
principles of organic farming for good and healthy crops and
harvest and take crops to pension pay-outs.
Turkey
Creating a group and working as a group to access the market.
Contributing moneyas a group for transport to access the
market. Individuals will provide different crops to the market.
MILESTONE 5: REVIEW AND NETWORKING (1): PROGRESS REPORT.
| 35
4.Tools for
farming
Sedawa & Mametja
Selling their organic produce and use the profit to buy farming
tools. Starting small when buying the tools
Turkey
Take a loan from the savingsgroup and buy tools like
wheelbarrows, watering cans and spades.
5.Identity
Sedawa & Mametja
Creating a name for our group as a form of identity andteach
people the benefit of organic farming.
Turkey
Using the tala tableas aform of identity and letting people
around the community known that they are farming and selling
organic produce.
6.Money
Sedawa & Mametja
Harvesting crops and sells them in local markets. Selling broilers
to the communities to make money.
Turkey
Plant and sell vegetables to make money and selling seeds that
they save.
7.Farmers
input
Sedawa & Mametja
Going around asking capital for the inputs.
Turkey
Asking organizations such as MDF, AWARD and to help with
inputs.
8.PGS
Vision
Sedawa & Mametja
Making sure that we follow PGS procedures as a group
Turkey
Doing ourown field visit as a PGS group to insurethat we
everyone is following the rules.
Figure 35: Above Left and Right: Pictures form the PGS training in March 2021
Garden maps and PGS procedures
It is a PGS requirement to havea detailed garden map with numbered beds, planting dates etc. Maps drawn
in the previous session were printed for each participant and were given to their respective owners during
the recent PGS training. Maps were assessed to find out common features.It was found that it would
probably be necessary to do a map with each participant at their homes, to be able to ensure accuracy, as
participants struggled to do this abstractly.
Participants were taken through the rules and pledgesof PGS. It was outlined that all participants have to
participate under PGS as it is participatory guarantee system, Participants came up with their group name;
the Mametja Sekororo PGS group.
Participants were then tasked with finding another innovative way of using their Tala Tables. MDF and
AWARD are in the process of designing a process for youth involvement in marketing logistics and the Tala
Tables.
Conclusion
Issues that still need attention:
MILESTONE 5: REVIEW AND NETWORKING (1): PROGRESS REPORT.
| 36
Some participants did not have maps and most ofthe maps of participants were not done properly
drawn as some features on the maps were absent. Participants will then be helped again to draw
their maps.
There were some participants who mentioned that theywere ready for being part of PGS and also
for being assessed and field visits will be done for those participants.
Coordinates will also be captured for each of the participants homestead during the field visit.
Market progress: K2C, Hoedspruit farmers marketand Kamogelo market
Written by Betty Maimela
MarketMonitoring case study. Christina Thobejane: February 2021
Christina Thobejane is the Local Facilitator for Sedawa and wasone of the farmers who started with
incorporating bed designs like trench beds and eco-circles in her garden. These results both encourage her
and other farmers in the area to continue to improve. She now has a tunnel
a mandala bed and 20trench beds in her garden, having expanded her
production substantially to incorporate all the available space. She alsohas
around 18 mango trees. Shealso uses mulching and adds kraalmanure to
her beds whenplanting. For water she has drilled a borehole in her yard,
has a 24m3 underground rainwater harvesting tank and 2x5000l JoJotanks.
trenchbeds in her garden. She started growing vegetables, herbs and fruits
in her garden and building her soil by adding compost, kraal manureand
mulching 90% of her garden.
She has included many different crop types in her garden, including herbs,
medicinal and pest repellent plants. She produces a range of herbs and
vegetables for sale and has recentlyalso started to propagate seedlings
which she sells at R1 each.
Figure 36: Right: A trench bed in her tunnel used for seedling propagation.
Prior to lockdown Christina was one ofthe main drivers for the organic
marketing activities in and around Hoedspruit, selling at the Hoedspruit
farmers Market, the Hlokomela Wellness Wednesday market and through
the Hoedpsruit Hub. After lockdown, when these markets were closed
down, she started selling mustard spinach, kale and swiss chard spinach
locally, making close to R100/day. Then she started selling at social grant
pay outs points selling common vegetables like spinach, onions and some
herbs that local people are not familiar with, where she spent time
explaining the uses and medicinal values of the different herbs.
Figure 37: Left:
coriander and fennel
in a trench bed,
produced forlocal
sales and pest
repellent properties,
centre: Marigolds for
pest and nematode
control and Right: A
basin of fever few
plants, that assist
with headaches
MILESTONE 5: REVIEW AND NETWORKING (1): PROGRESS REPORT.
| 37
Figure 38: Top left: Mandala bed where she planted swisschard spinach, kale, parsley and sorghum. Top Right
Harvested onionsbeing dried, Bottom Left: Lemon grass which is used to makea tea for high blood pressure and Bottom
Right: White butter beans planted from seeds she got on cross visits with other farmers.
The impact of COVId-19 on themarketing for Christina and otherfarmers likeher, has been significant.
Although the Hoedspruit farmers market has re-opened and Christina and the marketing group sell organic
vegetables there under the K2C from the Region for the Region banner. She now makes on average R350 in
a day at
this
market.
Prior to
lockdown
she made
around
R700 in a
day.
Figure 39:
Christina and K2C staff at their stall at the
monthly Hoedspruit farmers market.
Recently the Kamogelo market has alsoopened. It is another
monthlymarket, where Christina and the group sells. Even here
earnings are a bit low averaging around R150 -R400 per day of selling.
Figure 40: The market staff for the farmers
with Christina selling at the Kamogelo
market in Hoedspruit.
Christina explained themoney they
made at farmers’ markets was helping
so many families. Having a place where
they take their produce gave all farmers
courage to grow more produce and
MILESTONE 5: REVIEW AND NETWORKING (1): PROGRESS REPORT.
| 38
make money through selling organic produce. She also explained how happy she was to have access to more
than oneof these markets.
During lockdown, thesudden closureof the markets was a huge shock and farmers lost a lot of produce that
they now could not sell.This was temporarily alleviated when Hlokomela managed to raise some funding
forfood parcels and bought fresh produce form farmers. She also said that even though there are now
markets again that sales are less than before and although she understands that it is due to people having
lost their jobs and there being less money to spend, it also impacts on them and on her ability to make an
income.
Figure 41: Above Left: Incomemade by 5 farmers who sold organicvegetables at the Hoedspruit farmers Market on
the 5th December 2020 and Above right: The stall at the market.
MarketMonitoring case study.Norah Tshetlha:
February 2021
Norah Tshetlha is 83 years old and still a veryactive farmer.She has been
farming since she was very young and raised her kids through farming
income. She has both a big farm and a garden in her homestead. During
this process she has changed her farming to make her furrows and ridges
on contour, add organic matter and she also has 5 trench beds and a
tunnel.
She normallyworks with herunemployed grandchildrenin the garden.
She likes planting common vegetables that she can sell in the community:
Swiss chard spinach, beetroot, mustard spinach, carrots,tomatoes and
onions and she sells them atR10,00/bundle. Nora approached a day care
centre where she supplied them with 30 bundles of spinach every
Wednesday.
Figure 42: Nora Tshetlha with a bundle of spinach from her garden.
Through community level sales, organic markets in Hoedspruit and the
day care centre, Norah was making around R500 a week from vegetable
sales; moneywhich she used to provide education forher grand-children.
MILESTONE 5: REVIEW AND NETWORKING (1): PROGRESS REPORT.
| 39
Norah feels that this project has changed her life and helped hertomake a livelihood, where otherwise she
would have suffered.
Norah also makes liquid manure and uses kraal manure on her ridges and trench beds.
She was negatively affected by the lockdown, losing her income for an extended period. She is now selling
again, but at a reduced level, as the day care centre has not re-opened and marketing opportunities are
fewerin the community. She now relies more heavily on the marketing opportunities that MDF haveassisted
with.
Figure 43:Clockwise fromTop Left: A view of her furrows and ridges planted to vegetables, Norah’s liquid manure
and kraal manure and 3 trench beds planted mustard spinach, beetroot and carrots.
Water committees progress update
Introduction
Jo-jo stands that were installed by the contractors Afrisolutions, have turned outto be sub-standard and
have not held up well under thewight of the full Jo-Jo tanks. As Afrisolutions agreed not to charge for these
stands, a decision was made that MDF would
support the water committees financially to
rectify this situation.
Figure 44: Right: The photo indicates how the
stands in Sedawa have been buckling under the
weight of the Jo-jo tanks. Damage was also done to
the connecting piping due to the shifting of the
tanks.
In January, given the high levels of rainfall
participants stopped pumping waterinto the
tanks, to allow for the stands to be fixed. Betty contacted KM Bolt to get quotations of materials that will
be needed to fix the stands and got quotations from three local welders in the villages. She opted to work
with Manaso Seotlo, the son of one of the learning group members, as his quote was the most reasonable.
Manaso started working on all the Jo-jo stands after small meetings with the water committees to explain
the process to them.
MILESTONE 5: REVIEW AND NETWORKING (1): PROGRESS REPORT.
| 40
More solid frames were welded for the tanks, as well as a solid platform of bar piping. Manaso also re-
connected all the pipes and fittings, but the pipes at Sedawa had to be replaced as they were all damaged.
Then he tested the pipes and fittings by pumping water into the Jo-jo tanks and filling them and the stands
were observed to twoweeks to ensure their stability.
Figure 45: Clockwisefrom top left to bottom right: The
new stand structure, to which the bar platform is then
welded, after which the piping was reconnected and fixed
and the final new stands in Sedawa.
6.2Village Savingsand Loan Associations (VSLAs) and
enterprise development
Written by Thembani Mhabunda
Enterprise Development Follow-up
A follow up on business ideas offarmers were donein thevillages wheretheEnterprise Development
workshops were done. The focus of the follow up was on the progress of the enterprises to date and the
challenges faced by the entrepreneurs. The feedback of the progress of the enterprises to date and the
challenges faced by the entrepreneur are listed in the red columns in the tables below.
It is clear that group business ideas are not doing well at all due tothe fact that participants prefer working
individually ratherthan in groups. Start-up capital is also an obstacle to the participants and some
MILESTONE 5: REVIEW AND NETWORKING (1): PROGRESS REPORT.
| 41
participants mentioned that they don’t want to take loans for starting a business from the savings groups
since the money is paidback with interest and also that the loan money is not enough to start some particular
business. However, some participants are operating profitable businesses through the help of savings group
loans. Covid-19 also had a negative impact on participants businesses or business ideas since gathering was
prohibited hence businesses were not thriving. For participants who were planning on or running vegetable
businesses, high levels of rainfall have caused damage in their gardens and to their crops.
MILESTONE 5: REVIEW AND NETWORKING (1): PROGRESS REPORT.
| 42
Table 4: Enterprise Development Follow-up for Sedawa participants
Enterprise
Description
Name/s of
Entreprene
ur/s
Status
Target
Customers
Key Strategy
Support Required
Next Action:
Entrepreneur
Progress of Enterprises to
date
Challenges faced by the
Entrepreneur
1
2
3
Food/Grocery
Malepe
Mercy
X
Stokvel
buying groceries at
a stock price and
selling to grocery
stokvels.
Transportation
None
The Food/grocery business
is still a planned business
Currently selling snacks at
school
COVID-19 wasa challenge
since schools were closed
Egg layers
Magdeline
Malepe
X
Households
Local Shops
Already growing
traditional chickens
Requires skill and
knowledge
support from MDF
Currently
growing the
business
96 egg layers were
purchased
Eggs are being produced
each day
Planning to get a second
batch of layers
5 chickens out of 96 died
Transportation is an obstacle
Difference in egg size is also
a hurdle
None consistencein egg
production
Pricing the eggs
Spaza Shop
Thea
Morema
X
Kids
Selling icecream,
drinks, and snack
for kids
MDF tocontinue
giving her skills
and supervision
Raising capital
to expand the
business
Spaza shop is still running
Business is slow
Stock in thespaza shop
doesn’t go as expected
(Stock get outdated)
Cropping and
hat production
Mmakopila
Seotlo
X
Churches
Doing and Selling
hats to ZCC
members
Capital Support.
Has the skill and
knowledge
Expanding the
business using
her stokvel
share-out
Still a planned business.
Start- up capital
Saloon
Fridah
Thobejane
X
Local
residences
Selling hair products
Raise enough
capital to start
the enterprise
Still a planned business
Start-up capital
Crafting
Lawrence
Motshana
X
Households
Local shops
Planning to do and
sell wooden spoon
also thinking ofsell
firewood
Technicaland
management skills
Will use donkeys
to deliver the
firewood
Crafting is stilla planned
business
Currently selling fire wood
to thecommunity using a
cart
Donkeys used to carry the
Cart sometimes get lost
The cart does not have
proper tires dueto lack of
money to buy new tires.
MILESTONE 5: REVIEW AND NETWORKING (1): PROGRESS REPORT.
| 43
Enterprise
Description
Name/s of
Entreprene
ur/s
Status
Target
Customers
Key Strategy
Support Required
Next Action:
Entrepreneur
Progress of Enterprises to
date
Challenges faced by the
Entrepreneur
1
2
3
Sewing,
mending clothes
Thamara
Malepe
X
School kids
Has the sewing
machine and the
skill and knowledge
Technicaland
business
management skills
None
Still an operational
business
Selling to school kids
COVID-19 wasa challenge
since schools were closed
Farming crops
Sekgobela
Ronny
X
Households
Business
Selling vegetables
to the local people
Technicaland
business
management skills
Using the profit
to expand the
business.
Opened a spaza-shop
Running a transportation
business transporting
school kids.
They take long to pay him
the monthlytransportation
fee.
Stock in thespaza shop
doesn’t go as expected
(Stock get outdated)
Spaza shop
Daphney
Maphoru
X
Households
Has been selling
snacks in the shop,
None
The vegetable business is
operational.
Currently also selling
snacks to kids
She gives creditto school
kids and they take time to
repay.
Egg layers
Christina
Thobejane
X
Households
Local shop
Will use her bakkie
to deliver the eggs
to costumers and go
to pension pay out
to sell
RequiresSkill and
Knowledge
support from MDF
Raising enough
Capital to start
selling seeds
Still a planned business
Start-up capital
KEY - 1: Planned business | 2: Start-up Business | 3: Operational Business
Table 4”Enterprise Development Follow-up for Turkey participants
Enterprise
Description
Name/s of
Entreprene
ur/s
Status
Target
Customers
Key Strategy
Support Required
Next Action:
Entrepreneur
Progress of Enterprises to
date
Challenges faced by the
Entrepreneurs
1
2
3
Vegetables
Team
Impala(Pala)
Reckson’s
Group
X
Households
Selling organic
vegetable around
the community
MDF tocontinue
to give
Supervision
Use profit to sell
paraffin around
the community
Still a planned business
Challengewith starting a group
business
MILESTONE 5: REVIEW AND NETWORKING (1): PROGRESS REPORT.
| 44
Broilers
Team
Buffalo(Nari)
Alfred’s
Group
X
Households
Selling broilers
during Christmas
and events around
the community.
Have limited skill,
requiressupport
from MDF
None
Still a planned business
Members are planning their
business individually
Challengewith starting a group
business
Start-up capital
Broilers
Team duiker
(Phuti)
Tshehla’s
Group
X
Household
Selling broilers to
the local
community.
MDF tocontinue
giving them
supervision
None
Still a planned business
They will seek help from
department of agriculture
Challengewith starting a group
business
Start-up Capital
KEY - 1: Planned business | 2: Start-up Business | 3: Operational Business
Table 5: Enterprise Development Follow-up for Santeng and Willows Participants
Enterprise
Description
Name/s of
Entreprene
ur/s
Status
Target
Customers
Key Strategy
Support Required
Next Action:
Entrepreneur
Progress of Enterprises to
date
Challenges faced by the
Entrepreneurs
1
2
3
Vegetables
Group 1
Nomsa’s
Group
X
Households
Local shops
Town shops
Government
They plan to grow
produce required by
shops in town
Will rely on MDF to
provide technical,
business and
marketing skills
Continue to
participate in
CRA training
offered by MDF
Operational business
Selling individually
Been selling to households
and town shops.
Currently planting green
papers and chilies
Too much rain has been a
problem ascrops were
washed away
Challengewith running a
group business
Broilers
Group 2
Naume’s
Group
X
Households
Each member will
contribute R200 to
start the business
Production and
business skills
Will let MDF
know when
membershave
made their
contributions
Still a planned business
Start-up capital
Vegetables
Group 3
Fridah’s
Group
X
Households
Local shops
To use VSLA to
advance their
business practice
MDF tocontinue
giving them skills
and supervision
Grow own
seedlingsand
save seeds for
following years
An operational business
Selling to households
around the community
Currently planting green
beans
Too much rain has been a
problem ascrops were
washed away
Vegetables
Group 4
Moses’s
Group
X
Households
Local shops
Specifically want to
grow cabbage,
tomatoes, spinach,
Havelimited
skills, but will rely
Will work
towards growing
the business
Still an operational
business
Too much rain has been a
problem ascrops were
washed away
MILESTONE 5: REVIEW AND NETWORKING (1): PROGRESS REPORT.
| 45
carrots, etc. for
local market
through PGS
on MDF to advance
their skills
Busy planting different
crops
Egg layers
Group 5
Jerry’s
Group
X
Households
Local shops
Plan to start small,
sell to local
householdsand
graduallygrow
bigger. This will be
made possible by
investing profit
back in the business
MDF to provide
technical and
entrepreneurship
training and
supervision
Raise enough
capital to start
the enterprise
Still a planned business
Challengewith starting a
group business
Vegetables
Group 6
Ella’s Group
X
Households
Local shops
Plan to sell to
supermarkets in
town; and plan to
advancetechnical
and
entrepreneurship
skills
MDF to assist in
production,
securing markets
and
entrepreneurship
Will find bigger
production plot,
sink a borehole
and buy
production
equipment
Still a planned business
Busy planting different
crops
Too much rain has been a
problem ascrops were
washed away
Broilers
Group 7
Getrude’s
Group
X
Caterers
Shisanyama
Businesses
Will raise money
and attend training
workshops
Technicaland
business
management skills
Will assess
potential
customers
further
Still a planned business
Have not started with
anything
Start-up capital
Broilers
Group 8
Hunadi’s
Group
X
Households
Stokvels
Shisanyama
Caterers
Will secure
production credit
from theVLSA,use
profitto grow
business and to give
microloans to local
people
Technicaland
business
management skills
Secure
production
credit from VSLA
Still a planned business
Individualsare starting
their own business
Havea challenge ofworking
as a group
KEY - 1: Planned business | 2: Start-up Business | 3: Operational Business
MILESTONE 5: REVIEW AND NETWORKING (1): PROGRESS REPORT.
| 46
Enterprise Development casestudy: Magdelina Malepe
February 2021 AWARD Newsflash
AWARD partner Mahlathini Development Foundation (MDF) has been supporting small-scalefarmers in
Sekororo with enterprise development and at the same time contributing to food security in the area. This
case study gives insight on how Village Savings and Loans Associations (VSLAs) are helping break barriers to
food security and, by example, showing how the savings groups can be used to run andoperate profitable
business.
A year ago theVSLAs concept was introduced to the community and specifically to the farmers who are
participating in the farming learning groups. Enterprise Development (ED) training was provided to
demonstrate how small-scale farmers canuse money they have saved throughVSLAs in conjunction with the
knowledge from the ED training to start and operate profitable business enterprises.
Magdeline Malepe, a 58-year-old woman from Sedawa, a village in Maruleng municipality, isoneof the
farmers whobenefited from the ED training. After the ED training in October 2020, Magdeline decided to
start a poultry business. She purchased her first 96 layers as a start-up and has not looked back.
Figure 46: MagdelineMalepe withher
egg laying chickens
With thehelp of the savingsgroup,
it was possible for Magdeline to build
a poultry house while also selling
vegetables to the surrounding
communities and to bigger markets
such as the monthly Farmers Market
and Kamogelo Market around
Hoedspruit.
Magdeline Malepe is always one step ahead; she knowshow to run a profitable business. She has been
recording the production of eggs each day since the hens started laying eggs last year.
Figure 47: Egg records of
Magdeline’s business
A business is not without
challenges.Despite the
major achievement and
progressof Magdeline’s
poultry business, there are
still some obstacles:
1.Transportis an
obstacle for small
businesses.
Magdeline needs to
get chicken feed
and shedoes not have a car.The chickens sometimes go for days without food and this disturbs egg
production.
2.Chicken deaths: five of 96 chickens have died.
3.Difference in egg size can cause difficulties. Customers want the same size for the same price.
Despite these problems, demand is always higher than supply.
MILESTONE 5: REVIEW AND NETWORKING (1): PROGRESS REPORT.
| 47
VSLA Progress
Introduction
It has been over six (6) months since the introduction of the Village Savings and Loan Associations in Lower
Olifants Basin and the VSLA groups are
getting bigger and strongerevery savings
meeting. The cases of Covid-19 along the
lower Olifants Basin were at a peak in early
2021 hence supervision for the savings
groups were not provided in January2021.
Furthermore, facilitators who supervised
the savingsgroups had to isolate and
quarantine for seven days before going to
the field. However, groups that were left
behind in terms of understanding the rules
and regulations of a savings group were
assisted telephonically.
Figure 48: Willwos VSLA share out meeting in
January 2021.
6.2.3.1.1VSLAs Groups Challenges
Despite the progressmade there aresome challenges that are currently faced by the groups or that have
occurred through the process of growing. The challenges are as follows:
1.As the VSLA cycle approaches the end, money inside thebox increase and this becomes a challenge
to the members of the savings groupsastheybecome worried about their money. Due tothis
challenge, most groups after each savings meetingwant to leave the box empty and this becomes
a hurdle as members take loans without a plan on how they are going to use the loans, some
members are then forced to take loans and gokeep the moneyat their residences just forsafe
keeping.
2.In all the groups there aresome of the members that only buy shares anddonot take loans, and
this becomes an obstacle as members that are taking loans complain thatthey are making interest
to members who are not taking loans.
3.Members who fail to pay back the loans in the allocated four months becomes a stumbling block to
the group as other members in the groups wants to kick out those members without their concern.
4.Members are used to getting loans on the basis of two times the value of shares they have in the
group and as this changes from the 6thmonth of savings, it becomes a hurdle and members now
complain.
5.One of the key holders amongst the groups had lost the keys of the box and thebox had tobe broken
tobe opened. The key holders of that group then insisted and agreed that each key holder should
keep every key for the two padlocks rather than one person keeping all keys for each padlock for
the box.
6.All the VSLA groups started in the middle of the year last year and it has come to my attention that
some of the VSLA groups prefer to starttheir groups at the beginning of the year in January and end
it in December. Due to this issue, there were complications in some of the groups as they wanted
to do share-out in Januarysothat they can start afresh and can be able to do their share out in
December. Groups were advised to extend their saving cycle by 6 months so that theycan do share-
MILESTONE 5: REVIEW AND NETWORKING (1): PROGRESS REPORT.
| 48
out in December,however there is one group who did not take the advice anddid share-outin
January and started from scratch.
6.2.3.1.2VSLAs Groups updates
The following are general updates of the VSLAs groups in the Lower Olifants Basin:
The Setshwa Meetsi learning group inSedawa village has saved the mostandhas also issued and
repaid the highest amount of loans. In January 2021, the group did not meet for their monthly
savings meeting due to lack of finances to buy shares and repay loans. The group then decided to
meet in February 2021 without any supervision and decided to put their savings in a bank account
since they were concerned that themoney is getting too muchinside the box,overR25000 of
savings was taken to be saved at Capitec Bank.
Regakgona group from Santeng village has extendedtheir savings cycle from 12 months of savings
to 18 months of savings, they will have their share-out on December 2021.
The Epopeng saving group from the Willows village is thegroup that decidedto end their saving
cycle atsix months tostart afresh from January. Most members in the groupmentioned that they
want to use the money to pay school fees for their children and buy uniforms for them. Through
MDF experience the money from the first savings cycleis mainly used toresolve their immediate
financial challenges (consumption smoothing) before achieving the other goals of VSLA.
Table 6: Willows share out information for January 2021
Total number of Savings Group shares = R25 800
Total number of Group Fund = R3 0360
New Value of Share = R117,67
Book No
Initials
Surname
Total Shares
Share pay-out
1
K
Mahloko
7
R823
2
M.O
Lestwalo
10
R1176
3
P.A
Ramoshaba
17
R2000
4
L.K
Pako
48
R5648
5
H.B
Mogofe
6
R706
6
M
Shai
13
R1529
7
A
Mogofe
6
R706
8
E.T
Thete
9
R1059
9
B.F
Mashego
8
R941
10
S.K
Maile
7
R823
11
J
Mogofe
7
R823
12
K.E
Mokome
31
R3647
13
P
Malepe
7
R823
14
G.S
Mogofe
7
R823
15
A
Shai
12
R1412
16
M
Pako
13
R1529
17
T
Mogofe
11
R1294
18
M.J
Lewele
6
R706
19
A
Mmola
33
R3883
The total amount of the group fund at share-out was R30 360 with 258 of total shares of the group which is
equivalent to R25 800. The share pay-out ranged from as little as R706 to a maximum of R5 648.
MILESTONE 5: REVIEW AND NETWORKING (1): PROGRESS REPORT.
| 49
6.2.3.1.3 VSLA progress summary
The VSLAs have been active and saving and taking out small loans, with all groups doing well. Atotal of
R226 600 has been saved in the 9 VSLAs to date and R616275 small loans have been taken, between the 154
participants active in these groups, as shown in the small table below.
Village
Savings
Members
Loans
# VSLAs Groups
Worcester
R23 700
19
R 62 100
1
Santeng
R14 000
13
R 54 800
1
Sedawa
R71 700
57
R 252 435
3
Turkey
R50 000
33
R 158 060
2
The Willows
R43 400
19
R 57 080
1
Maderia
R23 800
13
R 31 800
1
Total
R226 600
154
R 616 275
9
The total amount of money saved in the groups, whenrepaid loans are included is R1323 335.00, which is
an impressive sum and averaged around R8 593 per participant.
The figure below outlines the savings made in the 9 VSLAs in operation.
Figure 49: Total monies saved by all 9 VSLAs to date. Note: The two yellow columns are for the two groups that have
recently undertaken their annual share outs.
7Monitoring, evaluation and learning
(MEL) plan
7.1Framework &indicators
Below is a summary of implementation according toour indicators for November 2020-April 2021
R23 700.00
R14 000.00
R33 800.00
R25 600.00
R17 600.00
R19 100.00
R30 900.00
R23 800.00
R17 200.00
R20 700.00
R 0.00
R5 000.00
R10 000.00
R15 000.00
R20 000.00
R25 000.00
R30 000.00
R35 000.00
R40 000.00
Share value
VSLA Groups
Savings
MILESTONE 5: REVIEW AND NETWORKING (1): PROGRESS REPORT.
| 50
Indicator
Overall target
Actual (November
2020-April 2021)
No of participants in learning groups
370(449)
155
No of learning groups
9-12(13)
9
-Noof local facilitators
6
9
Percentage of participants engaged in CCadaptation
responses
1-2 (45%)
2-3 (25%)
>3 (10-15%)
40%
35%
25%
No of participants experimenting with new
innovations:
-local
-co-designed
15%
45%
5%
65%
No of participants showing increased knowledge
35%
Not assessed in this period
Percentage ofparticipants engaged in collaborative
activities (water committees), marketing)
35%
33%%
Percentage of participants with improved livelihoods
-increased availability of food
-increased income
-increased diversity of activities and livelihoods
options
40%
5%
5%
35%
13%
3,5%
Qualitative assessments:
-stakeholderengagement
-Increased understanding and agency to acttowards
increased resilience
- Adaptation and innovations into local context
-Potential for increased resilience
-Social engagement
Stories, case
studies (5-6), CC
impact summaries
(4), best practices
booklet
2 CAimplementation case
studies; Mashego Shaiand
Meiiea Mokoena
2 Marketing case studies;
Christina Thobejaneand
Norah Tsethla
1 ED case study: Magdelina
Malepe
7.2Garden monitoring
Introduction
Garden monitoring has been changed toadd PGSassessment criteria, to allow for alignment of both
activities. The newmonitoring model helpsfarmers to know how far they aretobe assessed and what to
improve to be able to beorganically endorsed. Garden monitoring was first done with participants that are
in the process and are part of the PGS programme and workshop session. This monitoring tool isused as a
guide to farmers and evaluation tool of how farmers are improving to meet the SAOSA organic standard.
Garden monitoring was done both at Sedawa, Mametja and Turkey during January and February,where most
farmers have planted their summer crops like maize, ground nuts, cowpeas, Bambara nuts, sweet potatoes
and pumpkins,with fewervegetables in the garden. Most farmers have implemented thefive finger
principles in theirgardens (Water management, soil erosion management, soil fertility management, crop
management and natural resources management).
Water management
Firstly, there are a number of water management practices that are put in place, such as rainwater
harvesting through using furrows and ridges, gutters for collecting water and storing in jo-jo tanks, the use
of greywater for irrigation, mulching and planting of cover crops and legumes in their garden.
MILESTONE 5: REVIEW AND NETWORKING (1): PROGRESS REPORT.
| 51
Figure 50: Above Left: An example of a tower garden and Above Right: Planting of cowpeas as a cover crop with
maize.
Figure 51: Above Left to right: Sophie Moloto’s Jo-Jo tank for rainwater harvesting. A tube used by Sofie to mix
greywater with ash prior to use a bananabasin in MmaditiroMoradiye’s garde and Far-Right dry grass as a mulch for
a trench bed.
Soil movement control
These are practices that control and reduce wind
and water erosion, of soil and include,soil cover,
stone lines, furrows and ridges, swales,
Figure 52: Clockwise from Top Left: Stone lines,
Intercropping of mazie and legumes on contour with
mulching by Matshego Shai and Violet Magobatlou’a
furrows and ridges planted to sweet potatoes, next to
a banana basin.
MILESTONE 5: REVIEW AND NETWORKING (1): PROGRESS REPORT.
| 52
soil health improvement
Figure 53:
Clockwise frrm
Top Left: Nomsa
Mafologlele from
Staneg has 8
trench beds in
her garden to
improve soil
fertility and she
really loves the
results, Meisie
Mokwena makes
her own compost
and she adds it
to her trench
beds and fruit
tree basins to
improve soil
health,
Magdalene
Malepe adds
chicken manure
in her garden
from, furrows
and ridges in
Norah Tsethla’s
garden, mulched
with composted
manure added
shown in the
Bottom Left
picture
Crop management
This includes intercropping, mixed cropping, crop diversification and natural pest and disease control.
Figure 54: Farmers are implemented most of the practices that were introduced, they do mixed cropping of repellent
flowers, herbs and vegetables on their trench beds and mandala beds. Daphney Maphuru made her own liquid manure
using bush basil for pests and disease control.
MILESTONE 5: REVIEW AND NETWORKING (1): PROGRESS REPORT.
| 53
Natural resources management
This includes planting of indigenous and medicinal plants.
Figure 55: Trona Morema is one of the farmers who has a small nursery where she propagates organic mango
seedlings and small trees for sale locally.
PGS and Garden monitoring assessments
Here an e-survey was designed and administered to 20 participants in Turkey, Sedawa and Mametja
between November 2020 and February 2021, to get an indication of PGS organic endorsement readiness.
Table 5: PGS and Garden monitoring categories and monitoring assessments for 20 participants: Nov 2020-Feb 2021
PGS and Garden monitoring categories and assessments.
Assessment
Name and
Surname
Infiltration,
crusting, runoff
Organic matter
Greywater
RWH & storage
Irrigation
Water quality
Improvedcrop
management
Continuity
NP&D control
No of crop types
Crops
assessment
Fruit types and
no,
Fruit ass, incl
management
Livestock
integration
Food availability
Selling
Green
Yellow
Red
Mohlala Sara
G
G
Y
Y
Y
G
G
G
G
15
G
5; 27
G
Y
G
Y
64%
36%
Magalangake Mogale
Y
G
R
G
G
G
G
G
Y
8
Y
5;12
Y
R
Y
Y
43%
43%
14%
Sara Madire
G
G
R
G
Y
G
G
G
R
7
Y
4;22
G
R
Y
Y
50%
29%
21%
Shadrack Masete
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
7
Y
5;6
R
Y
G
R
7%
79%
14%
Christina Thobejane
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
18
G
5;36
G
R
G
G
93%
7%
Daphney Maphuru
G
G
R
G
Y
G
G
Y
G
14
G
8;25
G
Y
G
G
71%
21%
7%
Moses Mogofe
G
G
Y
G
G
G
G
G
Y
9
Y
5;24
Y
G
Y
Y
57%
43%
Isaac Malatjie
Y
Y
R
G
Y
G
Y
R
R
5
R
2;5
R
R
R
R
14%
29%
57%
Mmatshego Shai
Y
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
Y
14
G
7;36
G
Y
G
G
79%
21%
Malepe Lethabo
Y
Y
R
Y
Y
Y
G
Y
Y
8
Y
3;12
R
Y
Y
Y
7%
79%
7%
Maanawe Gladys
Shai
Y
G
R
Y
G
G
G
R
Y
8
Y
3;8
R
R
Y
Y
29%
43%
29%
Meisie Mokwena
Y
Y
R
G
G
G
G
G
G
14
G
6;11
Y
Y
Y
R
50%
43%
7%
Magdalena Malepe
Y
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
Y
9
Y
4;20
G
G
Y
G
71%
29%
Joyce Seotlo
R
G
R
G
G
R
G
Y
Y
7
Y
6;14
Y
Y
Y
R
29%
43%
29%
Makibeng Moradiye
Y
G
G
Y
G
G
G
G
G
9
Y
4;6
R
Y
Y
R
50%
36%
14%
Martha Moloto
Y
G
Y
Y
G
G
G
Y
G
12
G
5;13
R
R
Y
R
43%
36%
21%
Trona Morema
Y
G
Y
G
Y
G
G
G
Y
12
G
9;19
Y
Y
Y
R
43%
50%
7%
Sophy Moloto
Y
Y
R
G
Y
G
G
G
G
13
G
2;14
R
Y
Y
R
43%
43%
14%
Mmaditiro Moradiye
Y
G
Y
G
G
G
Y
G
G
12
G
9;49
G
Y
G
R
64%
29%
7%
Norman Mashinye
Y
Y
R
Y
G
G
G
Y
G
7
Y
8;24
G
G
G
R
50%
36%
14%
MILESTONE 5: REVIEW AND NETWORKING (1): PROGRESS REPORT.
| 54
From this table there are 13 of the 20 participants assessed who are considered ready forPGS endorsement,
another 6 who will need to improve their practises to be eligible and 1 participant who is not eligible. All
20 participants areundertaking organic farming; the formal PGS assessment is nowpossible for the
participants who have a green score.
A scale has been designed to be able to assess each category,according to the number of practises
undertaken to within that category. The small table below provides the outline.
Table 6: PGS assessments categories and scales linked to the “traffic light” colour coded assessment process for
garden monitoring and PGS organic endorsement.
Assessment category
Practises assessed
Infiltration
No runoff, diversion ditches, stone lines, mulching, dedicated beds, planting flowers,
hedges and trees (6 practices:2=red, 3-4=yellow and 5-6 =green)
Organic matter
Manure, compost, Conservation Agriculture, beds (trenches, eco-circles), liquid
manure, legumes (6 practices: 2=red, 3-4=yellow and 5-6 =green)
Greywater
use, ash, tower gardens (3 practises: 0=red; 1-2 =yellow and 3=green)
RWH & storage
drums, Jo-Jo tank with gutters, run-on, underground tanks, small dams, basins
(6 practices:2=red, 3-4=yellow and 5-6 =green)
Irrigation
Home-made watering cans, pipes, drip irrigation (3 practises: 0=red; 1-2 =yellow and
3=green)
Water quality
Boreholes, rainwater, spring water piped from the mountains, municipal water (4
practises: 0=red, 1-2 =yellow, 3-4 =green
Improved crop
management
Mixed cropping, diversification (incl new crop types), crop rotation (3 practises: 0=red;
1-2=yellow and 3=green)
Continuity
Seedling production, seed saving, nursery and propagation (3 practises: 0=red; 1-2
=yellow and 3=green)
Natural pest and
disease control
Mixed cropping, pest repellent species, pest control brews (3 practises: 0=red; 1-2
=yellow and 3=green)
No of crop types
Veg, field crops, herbs: No of crops: 1-5= red, 6-10=yellow and>11=green
Fruit
Types and no of fruit trees, management (pruning, composting) ( ≤3 types and ≤10
trees=red, 3-5 types 10-20 trees=yellow, ≥5 types and ≥20 trees=green)
Livestock
Poultry, goats, cattle, housing managed, feed managed, manure used, fodder crops
planted (Nolivestock=red, 1 type inclusive ofmanagement and use of manure= yellow,
more than one type inclusive of management and use of manure=green)
Food availability
1-2 crop types 1-2x/week= red; 2-3 crop types 2-3x/week= yellow and 3 crop types >3
times per week=green
Sale
locally, farmers markets, schools and events (3 practises: 0=red; 1-2 =yellow and
3=green)
8Work Plan for Milestone 6
Below a brief assessment of progress for each of the activities mentioned for the previous work plan is
provided.
1.Continue construction of the second batch of20 shade
cloth tunnels
Finalised end February 2021 (40 tunnels)
2.Continue monthly VSLA support for the 9 groups initiated
Two share out meetings have been held,
alongside the monthly savings meetings
MILESTONE 5: REVIEW AND NETWORKING (1): PROGRESS REPORT.
| 55
3.Continue with modules 4-7 of theenterprise
development training for the 3 groups (Santeng, Sedawa
and Turkey)
Finalised and Enterprisedevelopment follow-up
undertaken
4.Continue with PGStraining workshops 4-7 in partnership
with AWARD in Sedawa, Mametja, Willows and Turkey
Workshop 4 conducted.
5.Continue organic marketing processes with 30
participants with Hlokomela and K2C
Done
6.Run CCA planning workshops in Madeira and Mulalani
Done
7.Learning and mentoring workshops in agroecology and
CRA practices; including naturalpest and disease control,
Conservation Agriculture, seed saving and crop calendars
in 6 villages
Done: Learning in Conservation Agriculture,
seed saving, soilfertility, liquid manureand
tower gardensundertaken
8.Compile aproposal for support in water provision
activities in Santeng, Sedawa 2, Turkey 1 and Madeira
Submitted to both Americanand Canadian
embassies with no success
9.Garden level monitoring using e survey for a minimum of
60 participants
Done for 30 participants
10. Soil and water testing for the PGS groups
Soil sampling and analysis done for 10
participants
11. Initiate mango marketing system through M-Pak as
mangoes become ready (December-March)
Due to extreme weather I theearly season there
were almost no mangoesleft on the trees and
little to no harvests have been realized.
8.1Work plan for April - September 2021.
Below a brief work plan is presented:
1.Initiate second round of tunnel construction for 36 remaining tunnels,
2.Finalise PGS training forthe 30 participants (sessions 5 and 6) and support the Pollinator programme
to set up a smallholder PGS certification for !12 participants,
3.Continuation with marketing, VSLA and Enterprise development activities on a monthly basis,
4.Learning and mentoring sessions for 6-9 villages in food processing and value adding and soil and
water conservation for all groups,
5.Learning and mentoring in bed design, liquid manures, natural pest and disease control, mixed
cropping and cropping calendars for new groups and new participants in existing groups
6.Continuation with sale of improved mango varieties to participants,
7.Seasonal review and planning sessions for 5-8 learning groups and
8.Garden open day and cluster review and networking session.